Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court has held that an application of state law is preempted by section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act only if such application requires interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement. Lingle v. Norge Division, Magic Chef, Inc., 108 S. Ct. 1877 (1988)
This Note traces the development of federal preemption in labor law, examining Peterson as an illust...
Extensive federal labor legislation under the commerce clause has created a perplexing jurisdictiona...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Communications Workers of America v. Beck interpreted sect...
Congress, in section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, has provided a cause of action fo...
Employers are frequently subject to employee lawsuits alleging a tort. Non-unionized employees may s...
The Supreme Court has held that a ruling by the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Boar...
The doctrine of preemption is widely considered to be the most confusing area in labor law. In 1986,...
Plaintiff, an unincorporated labor organization, filed suit in federal district court to enforce a c...
This article previews the Supreme Court case Int\u27l Longshoremen\u27s Ass\u27n v. Davis, 476 U.S. ...
Several labor cases recently decided by the Supreme Court have brought into issue a conflict between...
After Lueck the preemption of state law claims by employees covered by collective bargaining agreeme...
A union picketed interstate motor carriers to induce non-union clerical employees to join the union,...
In three recent cases, the United States Supreme Court has been required to determine the impact of ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that an individual employee who asserts a right contained i...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.This article addresses an important United Stat...
This Note traces the development of federal preemption in labor law, examining Peterson as an illust...
Extensive federal labor legislation under the commerce clause has created a perplexing jurisdictiona...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Communications Workers of America v. Beck interpreted sect...
Congress, in section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, has provided a cause of action fo...
Employers are frequently subject to employee lawsuits alleging a tort. Non-unionized employees may s...
The Supreme Court has held that a ruling by the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Boar...
The doctrine of preemption is widely considered to be the most confusing area in labor law. In 1986,...
Plaintiff, an unincorporated labor organization, filed suit in federal district court to enforce a c...
This article previews the Supreme Court case Int\u27l Longshoremen\u27s Ass\u27n v. Davis, 476 U.S. ...
Several labor cases recently decided by the Supreme Court have brought into issue a conflict between...
After Lueck the preemption of state law claims by employees covered by collective bargaining agreeme...
A union picketed interstate motor carriers to induce non-union clerical employees to join the union,...
In three recent cases, the United States Supreme Court has been required to determine the impact of ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that an individual employee who asserts a right contained i...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.This article addresses an important United Stat...
This Note traces the development of federal preemption in labor law, examining Peterson as an illust...
Extensive federal labor legislation under the commerce clause has created a perplexing jurisdictiona...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Communications Workers of America v. Beck interpreted sect...