Add to ORKGThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that except in certain specified instances, the doctrine of assumption of risk is abolished in Pennsylvania. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School District, 496 Pa. 590, 437 A.2d 1198 (1981)
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that a college has no liability fo...
Tort Law- ASSUMPTION OF RISK- ADOPTION OF COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE REQUIRES THAT THE DEFENSE OF IMPLIE...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that harm resulting from the raising of a snow swirl by a...
A recent decision of the Washington Supreme Court casts considerable doubt on the exact status of th...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has allowed a professional athlete to recov...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that plaintiff could recover for physical injuries resulting...
While walking behind defendant through woodland, plaintiff suffered an eye injury caused by the negl...
This article analyzes the interrelationship between sports safety measures and sports injury litigat...
In the thrilling world of sports, we are accustomed to witnessing athletes push their bodies to the ...
A California Court of Appeals has held that a person\u27s status as a trespasser is now largely imma...
Plaintiff and her husband attended an ice hockey game being sponsored by the defendant. Both testifi...
The Casenote addresses the question: who is responsible when a participant in a sport is injured dur...
The Supreme Court of Florida has unanimously held that with the adoption of comparative negligence, ...
Plaintiff sued for injuries sustained when struck by a foul ball at a baseball game while seated in ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the lessor of a truck is not liable to lessee\u27s passenge...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that a college has no liability fo...
Tort Law- ASSUMPTION OF RISK- ADOPTION OF COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE REQUIRES THAT THE DEFENSE OF IMPLIE...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that harm resulting from the raising of a snow swirl by a...
A recent decision of the Washington Supreme Court casts considerable doubt on the exact status of th...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has allowed a professional athlete to recov...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that plaintiff could recover for physical injuries resulting...
While walking behind defendant through woodland, plaintiff suffered an eye injury caused by the negl...
This article analyzes the interrelationship between sports safety measures and sports injury litigat...
In the thrilling world of sports, we are accustomed to witnessing athletes push their bodies to the ...
A California Court of Appeals has held that a person\u27s status as a trespasser is now largely imma...
Plaintiff and her husband attended an ice hockey game being sponsored by the defendant. Both testifi...
The Casenote addresses the question: who is responsible when a participant in a sport is injured dur...
The Supreme Court of Florida has unanimously held that with the adoption of comparative negligence, ...
Plaintiff sued for injuries sustained when struck by a foul ball at a baseball game while seated in ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the lessor of a truck is not liable to lessee\u27s passenge...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that a college has no liability fo...
Tort Law- ASSUMPTION OF RISK- ADOPTION OF COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE REQUIRES THAT THE DEFENSE OF IMPLIE...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that harm resulting from the raising of a snow swirl by a...