Changes in skin blood flow, respiration and blood pressure in participants reporting motion sickness during sinusoidal galvanic vestibular stimulation

New Findings: What is the central question of the study? We have previously shown that sinusoidal galvanic vestibular stimulation induces greater modulation of skin sympathetic nerve activity, but not muscle sympathetic nerve activity, in participants who report nausea during simulated motion, but the effects on skin blood flow and blood pressure are unknown. What is the main finding and its importance? During vestibular stimulation, nausea was associated with a greater increase in skin blood flow and a progressive reduction in skin sympathetic nerve activity, but no changes in muscle sympathetic nerve activity. This emphasizes the differential changes in sympathetic outflow to different tissues during nausea. Abstract: We tested the hypothesis that galvanic vestibular stimulation, which produces illusions of side-to-side swaying, causes a greater reduction in skin blood flow in participants who report stimulation-induced nausea. A retrospective analysis was performed on data obtained in 30 participants. Bipolar sinusoidal galvanic vestibular stimulation (sGVS) was applied across the mastoid processes (±2 mA, 0.08 Hz) for 21 min. ECG, continuous blood pressure, respiration and skin blood flow were recorded. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity was recorded in 17 participants and skin sympathetic nerve activity in 12. Ten participants reported motion sickness, whereas 20 did not. Both groups showed an initial reduction in skin (finger) blood flow during sGVS, followed by a sustained increase and a subsequent return towards baseline levels throughout the stimulation; the increase was greater in those who experienced nausea. The increase fits with the progressive reduction in skin sympathetic nerve activity observed in the nauseous group. Mean blood pressure was significantly lower in those who experienced nausea and showed a much larger increase at the onset of sGVS, compared with those who did not. Moreover, the respiratory rate was higher at the outset for the subjects who experienced nausea, decreasing progressively during sGVS, whereas respiratory rate remained constant in those who did not experience nausea. Heart rate was more labile in the subjects who experienced nausea, showing a sustained increase towards the end of stimulation. We have shown that several autonomic parameters change during the nausea induced by vestibular stimulation, but a sustained decrease in skin blood flow is not a hallmark of incipient motion sickness