Is it time to ask whether facility based birth is safe for low risk women and their babies?

Despite evidence to the contrary, homebirth remains a controversial choice in maternity care, with strong opinions expressed by consumers, health providers and the media [1]. There is rarely any differentiation between the media reporting of adverse outcomes associated with freebirth or homebirth attended by registered health providers [2]. This can cause health services to resist consumer demand for system integrated homebirth [3]. Research shows that homebirth is as safe as hospital birth for women who are low risk and attended by professional midwives who, in turn, are well networked into a responsive health system [4]. It can be less safe for the baby when women with significant risk factors choose homebirth, or when they give birth without regulated health providers in attendance. When systems are overly restrictive and there is significant variation in guidance on homebirth [5], confusion and conflict inevitably arises amongst and between consumers, policy makers and health providers. Internationally, rates of homebirth attended by registered health professionals (usually a midwife) range from 13% in the Netherlands [6] to 0.3% in Australia [7]. In some countries, homebirth is deemed illegal and midwives are being prosecuted or jailed for supporting women who make this choice [8]