The issue of who has the power to declare war or authorise military action in a democracy has become a major legal and political issue, internationally, and is set to become even more pertinent in the immediate future, particularly in the wake of military action in Syria, ongoing wars in the Middle East, and tense discussions between the United States and its allies, and Russia and China. This book comparatively examines the executive and prerogative powers to declare war or launch military action, focusing primarily on the United States, Britain and Australia. It explores key legal and constitutional questions, including: who currently has the power/authority to declare war? Who currently has the power to launch military action without fo...
The Australian Defence Force, together with military forces from a number of western democracies, ha...
This book raises a number of significant issues that have received little official, parliamentary an...
What is the purpose of the international law on armed conflict, and why would opponents bent on dest...
[As of 2006, part IIIAAA of the Defence Act 1903 (Cth) permits Australian military aircraft and wars...
Existing legal scholarship about constitutional war powers focuses overwhelmingly on the President\u...
This book examines the national and international law, human rights and civil liberties issues invol...
Our 1901 Constitution fails to answer this most basic of questions, says George Williams IF YOU wan...
Symposium: War, Terrorism and Torture: Limits on Presidential Power in the 21st Century. Convened by...
How parliaments and legislatures participate in war-making has raised interest among researchers fro...
There is no issue of foreign relations law more important than the allocation of authority over the ...
This Article explores the eighteenth-century use of the phrase declare war, with the goal of shedd...
This Essay, written as a response to a pro-Congress view in the war powers debate, presents a comple...
Wishing to be helpful, Nurturing the Imperial Presidency by Brien Hallett illuminates the 5,000-year...
The use of military force is an excellent example of how the decision-making process has traditional...
The Senate Judiciary Committee convened to determine which branch of the American government, execut...
The Australian Defence Force, together with military forces from a number of western democracies, ha...
This book raises a number of significant issues that have received little official, parliamentary an...
What is the purpose of the international law on armed conflict, and why would opponents bent on dest...
[As of 2006, part IIIAAA of the Defence Act 1903 (Cth) permits Australian military aircraft and wars...
Existing legal scholarship about constitutional war powers focuses overwhelmingly on the President\u...
This book examines the national and international law, human rights and civil liberties issues invol...
Our 1901 Constitution fails to answer this most basic of questions, says George Williams IF YOU wan...
Symposium: War, Terrorism and Torture: Limits on Presidential Power in the 21st Century. Convened by...
How parliaments and legislatures participate in war-making has raised interest among researchers fro...
There is no issue of foreign relations law more important than the allocation of authority over the ...
This Article explores the eighteenth-century use of the phrase declare war, with the goal of shedd...
This Essay, written as a response to a pro-Congress view in the war powers debate, presents a comple...
Wishing to be helpful, Nurturing the Imperial Presidency by Brien Hallett illuminates the 5,000-year...
The use of military force is an excellent example of how the decision-making process has traditional...
The Senate Judiciary Committee convened to determine which branch of the American government, execut...
The Australian Defence Force, together with military forces from a number of western democracies, ha...
This book raises a number of significant issues that have received little official, parliamentary an...
What is the purpose of the international law on armed conflict, and why would opponents bent on dest...