Parents who do not vaccinate their children create risk of harm to those in society who are vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases. Current avenues of redress to those harmed, namely negligence law, present many hurdles. This article considers alternative avenues of redress such as user-pays no fault insurance or compensation schemes
Vaccinations have become a contentious issue in recent times. Although there has always been opposit...
The article focuses on the analysis of the parent situation (or statutory representatives) who are u...
Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), vaccination has reduced the burden of ...
Since their widespread introduction in the early 20th century, vaccinations have saved millions of l...
This article explores whether parents can or should be civilly liable for damages when (1) their unv...
A parent’s decision not to vaccinate a child may place others at risk if the child becomes infected ...
Mass vaccination has been a successful public health strategy for many contagious diseases. The immu...
Imposing tort liability on parents who fail to vaccinate their children would not serve the public h...
Should a parent who takes advantage of a personal belief exemption to avoid vaccinating a child be h...
The measles outbreak of early 2015 is symptomatic of a larger societal problem–the growing number of...
Vaccination aims to prevent infectious disease, and is internationally acclaimed as a major contribu...
The 2015 Disneyland outbreak of measles in the US unequivocally brought to light what had been brewi...
Polio, the whooping cough, and the mumps, among many other communicable diseases, were once preval...
Public health agencies and citizens should employ legal approaches to hold parents accountable for r...
The 2017 Thrower Symposium focused on how law addresses serious global public health challenges. The...
Vaccinations have become a contentious issue in recent times. Although there has always been opposit...
The article focuses on the analysis of the parent situation (or statutory representatives) who are u...
Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), vaccination has reduced the burden of ...
Since their widespread introduction in the early 20th century, vaccinations have saved millions of l...
This article explores whether parents can or should be civilly liable for damages when (1) their unv...
A parent’s decision not to vaccinate a child may place others at risk if the child becomes infected ...
Mass vaccination has been a successful public health strategy for many contagious diseases. The immu...
Imposing tort liability on parents who fail to vaccinate their children would not serve the public h...
Should a parent who takes advantage of a personal belief exemption to avoid vaccinating a child be h...
The measles outbreak of early 2015 is symptomatic of a larger societal problem–the growing number of...
Vaccination aims to prevent infectious disease, and is internationally acclaimed as a major contribu...
The 2015 Disneyland outbreak of measles in the US unequivocally brought to light what had been brewi...
Polio, the whooping cough, and the mumps, among many other communicable diseases, were once preval...
Public health agencies and citizens should employ legal approaches to hold parents accountable for r...
The 2017 Thrower Symposium focused on how law addresses serious global public health challenges. The...
Vaccinations have become a contentious issue in recent times. Although there has always been opposit...
The article focuses on the analysis of the parent situation (or statutory representatives) who are u...
Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), vaccination has reduced the burden of ...
DOI
Add to ORKG