Antiphon the Sophist's critique of law

Antiphon has often been singled out by scholars as the Sophist who gave expression to the most radical critique of law. He is often spoken of as an immoralist thinker, who recommended that people reject the established laws and pursue solely what is in their self-interest. In this thesis, the grounds for ascribing the label of immoralist to Antiphon will be assessed. I will argue that it is misguided to view Antiphon in this regard on two principal counts: his purpose in 'On Truth' is to underline the inconsistencies and failings of existing legislation, and in no way to advocate for people to disregard the laws in force; in both 'On Truth' and in 'On Concord,' he shows an attachment to the laws, and in the second of the two works, he even advances a reason for why they should be regarded as salutary and beneficial.