Examines the extent to which an overlap exists between the legal categories of public law and tort. Considers how the tortious doctrines of misfeasance in public office and exemplary damages for oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional actions by servants of the Government may fall within public law, and whether the same is true for the tort of malicious prosecution. Discusses the implications of treating the doctrines as part of public law
Unlike many other core areas of law that students are required to study in their degree, the law of ...
According to the common understanding, tort law is the branch of private law whose set of positive r...
Recently the Federal Court of Australia found that a Commonwealth Minister had committed the tort of...
The aim of the thesis is to examine the liability of public authority's within the context of the pu...
This article explores the peculiarities of the tort of misfeasance in a public office from the persp...
In recent years, the highly restrictive attitude taken by English courts to public authority liabili...
This Note analyzes the Coleman case. The Note suggests that the court incorrectly applied the public...
The remark has occasionally been made that there is nothing that can accurately be called a law of ...
While scholars routinely question the normative significance of the distinction between public law a...
Although the legislature has made significant inroads into tort law, tort theorists have focused the...
Private law subjects like tort, contract, and property are traditionally taken to be at the core of ...
The doctrine of illegality is now in vogue as an answer to liability in tort. It is also very regula...
Although the legislature has made significant inroads into tort law, tort theorists have focused the...
When I was a first year law student I was often asked to explain what was meant by the word torts, ...
The aim of this chapter is to explore, and offer an explanation of, a striking difference between U...
Unlike many other core areas of law that students are required to study in their degree, the law of ...
According to the common understanding, tort law is the branch of private law whose set of positive r...
Recently the Federal Court of Australia found that a Commonwealth Minister had committed the tort of...
The aim of the thesis is to examine the liability of public authority's within the context of the pu...
This article explores the peculiarities of the tort of misfeasance in a public office from the persp...
In recent years, the highly restrictive attitude taken by English courts to public authority liabili...
This Note analyzes the Coleman case. The Note suggests that the court incorrectly applied the public...
The remark has occasionally been made that there is nothing that can accurately be called a law of ...
While scholars routinely question the normative significance of the distinction between public law a...
Although the legislature has made significant inroads into tort law, tort theorists have focused the...
Private law subjects like tort, contract, and property are traditionally taken to be at the core of ...
The doctrine of illegality is now in vogue as an answer to liability in tort. It is also very regula...
Although the legislature has made significant inroads into tort law, tort theorists have focused the...
When I was a first year law student I was often asked to explain what was meant by the word torts, ...
The aim of this chapter is to explore, and offer an explanation of, a striking difference between U...
Unlike many other core areas of law that students are required to study in their degree, the law of ...
According to the common understanding, tort law is the branch of private law whose set of positive r...
Recently the Federal Court of Australia found that a Commonwealth Minister had committed the tort of...