Application of causal inference methods in the analyses of randomised controlled trials: A systematic review

Background Applications of causal inference methods to randomised controlled trial (RCT) data have usually focused on adjusting for compliance with the randomised intervention rather than on using RCT data to address other, non-randomised questions. In this paper we review use of causal inference methods to assess the impact of aspects of patient management other than the randomised intervention in RCTs. Methods We identified papers that used causal inference methodology in RCT data from Medline, Premedline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from 1986 to September 2014, using a forward citation search of five seminal papers, and a keyword search. We did not include studies where inverse probability weighting was used solely to: balance baseline characteristics; adjust for loss to follow-up; or adjust for non-compliance to randomised treatment. Studies where the exposure could not be assigned were also excluded. Results 25 papers were identified. Nearly half the papers (11/25) estimated the causal effect of concomitant medication on outcome. The remainder were concerned with post-randomisation treatment regimens (sequential-treatments, n=6), effects of timing of second-line treatment (n=1) and treatment dosing or duration (n=7). Examples were found in cardiovascular disease (n=5), HIV (n=7), cancer (n=6), mental health (n=4), paediatrics (n=2) and transfusion medicine (n=1). The most common method implemented was a marginal structural model with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Conclusions Examples of studies which exploit RCT data to address non-randomised questions using causal inference methodology remain relatively limited, despite the growth in methodological development and increasing utilisation in observational studies. Further efforts may be needed to promote use of causal methods to address additional clinical questions within RCTs to maximise their value.