The paper analyzes the question why the U.S. economy in the 2000:4-2004:3 period was sluggish in light of the large expansionary fiscal and monetary policies that took place. The answer does not appear to be that there were large structural changes in the economy or systematic bad shocks. This paper tests for such changes and shocks, and the results are generally negative. Instead, the main culprits seem to be large negative effects from declines in the stock market and exports. Although not tested in this paper, some of the decline in exports may be the result of the stock market decline, in which case most of the explanation is simply the stock market decline itself
In our recent paper, (Reinhart and Reinhart, 2010) we examine the behavior of real GDP (levels and g...
Our case study of the 1995 economic slowdown reveals that part of the widespread deterioration in ec...
This paper reports the estimates of the dynamic growth rate of U.S. economy using exponential growth...
The paper analyzes the question why the U.S. economy in the 2000:4-2004:3 period was sluggish in lig...
This paper argues that the slow U.S. recovery after the 2008–2009 recession was due to sluggish gove...
This paper examines how much structural change there was in the U.S. economy in the last half of the...
This paper reconsiders the role of macroeconomic shocks and policies in determining the Great Recess...
Using data from government sources (FRED, BEA, BLS), the thesis explores the underlying reasons for ...
This paper uses a range of structural VARs to show that the response of US stock prices to fiscal sh...
Nine U.S. recessions and three expansions are analyzed in this paper using a structural macroeconome...
This paper investigates whether the monetary policy and the market structure have anything to do wit...
Is this a new economy? Inflation and interest rates are low. Compared to previous recess...
In the article the reasons for the deceleration of the average annual rates of economic growth of th...
This paper quantitatively assesses the relative importance of demand and supply-side factors in the ...
This paper concludes that the failure to realize the anticipated job growth, following the enormous ...
In our recent paper, (Reinhart and Reinhart, 2010) we examine the behavior of real GDP (levels and g...
Our case study of the 1995 economic slowdown reveals that part of the widespread deterioration in ec...
This paper reports the estimates of the dynamic growth rate of U.S. economy using exponential growth...
The paper analyzes the question why the U.S. economy in the 2000:4-2004:3 period was sluggish in lig...
This paper argues that the slow U.S. recovery after the 2008–2009 recession was due to sluggish gove...
This paper examines how much structural change there was in the U.S. economy in the last half of the...
This paper reconsiders the role of macroeconomic shocks and policies in determining the Great Recess...
Using data from government sources (FRED, BEA, BLS), the thesis explores the underlying reasons for ...
This paper uses a range of structural VARs to show that the response of US stock prices to fiscal sh...
Nine U.S. recessions and three expansions are analyzed in this paper using a structural macroeconome...
This paper investigates whether the monetary policy and the market structure have anything to do wit...
Is this a new economy? Inflation and interest rates are low. Compared to previous recess...
In the article the reasons for the deceleration of the average annual rates of economic growth of th...
This paper quantitatively assesses the relative importance of demand and supply-side factors in the ...
This paper concludes that the failure to realize the anticipated job growth, following the enormous ...
In our recent paper, (Reinhart and Reinhart, 2010) we examine the behavior of real GDP (levels and g...
Our case study of the 1995 economic slowdown reveals that part of the widespread deterioration in ec...
This paper reports the estimates of the dynamic growth rate of U.S. economy using exponential growth...