It is the purpose of this article to study stockholder votes motivated by adverse interest from the standpoint of the attack and the defense. First, the remedies available to the complaining minority are examined. Then follows a study of the indicia of adverse interest in specific shareholder actions. Knowledge of the nature and import of these indicia should enable the careful lawyer to avoid or defeat the charge that unconscionable adverse interest vitiated the result of a stockholder vote
Shareholder voting is a key part of contemporary American corporate governance. As numerous contempo...
Voting lies at the center of collective decision-making in corporate law. While scholars have identi...
This paper considers the efficiency implications of managerial favoritism towards block shareholde...
Over the past decade, executive compensation has become a controversial topic. Increasingly, corpora...
Article published in law review.For many years academics have debated whether it is better to permit...
Corporate law is attentive to transactions with a controlling shareholder, but such transactions har...
Quite frequently it becomes desirable for corporate stockholders to combine the voting power of thei...
Legislation has attempted to balance fairly the interests of the dissenting shareholder against the ...
The Supreme Court of Michigan recently decided the case of Ecclestone v. Indialantic, Inc., the impo...
article published in law reviewDiscussion of shareholder voting frequently begins against a backgrou...
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of hostile share acquisitions o...
Recent Delaware jurisprudence establishes a disinterested vote of shareholders as the pathway out of...
Plaintiffs, minority stockholders of defendant corporation, brought an equitable action against cert...
This paper examines the economic consequences of proxy voting results perceived by some investors to...
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of hostile share acquisitions o...
Shareholder voting is a key part of contemporary American corporate governance. As numerous contempo...
Voting lies at the center of collective decision-making in corporate law. While scholars have identi...
This paper considers the efficiency implications of managerial favoritism towards block shareholde...
Over the past decade, executive compensation has become a controversial topic. Increasingly, corpora...
Article published in law review.For many years academics have debated whether it is better to permit...
Corporate law is attentive to transactions with a controlling shareholder, but such transactions har...
Quite frequently it becomes desirable for corporate stockholders to combine the voting power of thei...
Legislation has attempted to balance fairly the interests of the dissenting shareholder against the ...
The Supreme Court of Michigan recently decided the case of Ecclestone v. Indialantic, Inc., the impo...
article published in law reviewDiscussion of shareholder voting frequently begins against a backgrou...
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of hostile share acquisitions o...
Recent Delaware jurisprudence establishes a disinterested vote of shareholders as the pathway out of...
Plaintiffs, minority stockholders of defendant corporation, brought an equitable action against cert...
This paper examines the economic consequences of proxy voting results perceived by some investors to...
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of hostile share acquisitions o...
Shareholder voting is a key part of contemporary American corporate governance. As numerous contempo...
Voting lies at the center of collective decision-making in corporate law. While scholars have identi...
This paper considers the efficiency implications of managerial favoritism towards block shareholde...