Add to ORKGIn three recent cases the Supreme Court has reopened the question of the extent to which federal courts will review the general fairness of state schemes of legislative apportionment. It is a question on which the Court has had nothing to say for over a decade, leaving the bar to patch together the current state of the law from the outcome of cases disposed of without opinion considered against a backdrop of language used in earlier decisions
Fair representation is the ultimate goal. At the time of the Reapportionment Decisions, much change ...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that unless there is adequate justification, a feder...
The Tennessee reapportionment decision, Baker v. Carr,\u27 has been popularly characterized as one o...
The Court\u27s decision in Baker v. Carr was properly cast in terms of protecting individual rights ...
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) marked the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s entry into the political thic...
In its continuing role as guardian of citizens’ constitutional rights, the Supreme Court in Baker v....
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Baker v. Carr promises to be one of themost important of the cent...
If asked to identify the two most important cases decided by the Supreme Court of the United States ...
Petitioners, three qualified Illinois voters, filed a proceeding in a United States district court c...
Malapportioned legislative districts traditionally have inhibited the effective working of governmen...
The decision of the majority of the Supreme Court in Baker v. Carr, the recently decided Tennessee R...
Since several of his senior brethren devoted well over one hundred and fifty pages of the United Sta...
Of the many problems left unanswered in Baker v. Carr,\u27 the one that has received the most attent...
The increasingly complex problems of elucidating congressional apportionment standards and granting ...
Since Baker v. Carr, when the Supreme Court overruled a long line of earlier decisions and conclude...
Fair representation is the ultimate goal. At the time of the Reapportionment Decisions, much change ...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that unless there is adequate justification, a feder...
The Tennessee reapportionment decision, Baker v. Carr,\u27 has been popularly characterized as one o...
The Court\u27s decision in Baker v. Carr was properly cast in terms of protecting individual rights ...
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) marked the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s entry into the political thic...
In its continuing role as guardian of citizens’ constitutional rights, the Supreme Court in Baker v....
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Baker v. Carr promises to be one of themost important of the cent...
If asked to identify the two most important cases decided by the Supreme Court of the United States ...
Petitioners, three qualified Illinois voters, filed a proceeding in a United States district court c...
Malapportioned legislative districts traditionally have inhibited the effective working of governmen...
The decision of the majority of the Supreme Court in Baker v. Carr, the recently decided Tennessee R...
Since several of his senior brethren devoted well over one hundred and fifty pages of the United Sta...
Of the many problems left unanswered in Baker v. Carr,\u27 the one that has received the most attent...
The increasingly complex problems of elucidating congressional apportionment standards and granting ...
Since Baker v. Carr, when the Supreme Court overruled a long line of earlier decisions and conclude...
Fair representation is the ultimate goal. At the time of the Reapportionment Decisions, much change ...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that unless there is adequate justification, a feder...
The Tennessee reapportionment decision, Baker v. Carr,\u27 has been popularly characterized as one o...