The United States, as assignee of a civilian seaman\u27s claim, brought an action against the defendant for injuries received when the seaman slipped on a walkway which the defendant had contracted to maintain in good repair. At the trial plaintiff sought to introduce into evidence a report compiled by the seaman\u27s superior, such report being required to accompany the seaman\u27s claim for compensation from the Government. Admission of the report under the Federal Business Records Act was denied, and the Government\u27s case was thereby materially weakened. Judgment was entered on a jury verdict for the defendant. On appeal, held, reversed and remanded for a new trial. Two of the judges, employing different rationales, concluded that the...
In Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey, the United States Supreme Court held that opinions and conclusion...
The clocktower of plaintiff county\u27s courthouse buckled and collapsed into the courtroom below. C...
The recent Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals opinion, United States v. Barry Bonds , is a murky di...
Plaintiff sued for injuries allegedly resulting when the door of defendant\u27s bus closed on plaint...
The business entry exception to the hearsay evidence rule has been prolific of legal literature and ...
Claimant suffered a coronary occlusion and as a result was totally disabled, being unable to speak c...
In an action for personal injuries suffered in defendant\u27s store, plaintiff moved for an order re...
As a defense to a suit on an insurance policy, the defendant insurer claimed that the plaintiff was ...
This paper discusses how attorneys can argue against having government and public reports admitted i...
The hearsay exception for public records was recognized at common law and has been further develop...
Among the most significant exceptions to the hearsay rule is the business records exception.\u27 Wit...
This article discusses problems encountered by attorneys faced with complex civil litigation where m...
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(C), an exception to the rule against admission of hearsay, permits i...
Lewandowski v. Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co., 33 Wis. 2d 69, 146 N.W.2d 505 (1966)
Covers cases on exceptions to the hearsay rule, on facts that must be included in hypothetical quest...
In Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey, the United States Supreme Court held that opinions and conclusion...
The clocktower of plaintiff county\u27s courthouse buckled and collapsed into the courtroom below. C...
The recent Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals opinion, United States v. Barry Bonds , is a murky di...
Plaintiff sued for injuries allegedly resulting when the door of defendant\u27s bus closed on plaint...
The business entry exception to the hearsay evidence rule has been prolific of legal literature and ...
Claimant suffered a coronary occlusion and as a result was totally disabled, being unable to speak c...
In an action for personal injuries suffered in defendant\u27s store, plaintiff moved for an order re...
As a defense to a suit on an insurance policy, the defendant insurer claimed that the plaintiff was ...
This paper discusses how attorneys can argue against having government and public reports admitted i...
The hearsay exception for public records was recognized at common law and has been further develop...
Among the most significant exceptions to the hearsay rule is the business records exception.\u27 Wit...
This article discusses problems encountered by attorneys faced with complex civil litigation where m...
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(C), an exception to the rule against admission of hearsay, permits i...
Lewandowski v. Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co., 33 Wis. 2d 69, 146 N.W.2d 505 (1966)
Covers cases on exceptions to the hearsay rule, on facts that must be included in hypothetical quest...
In Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey, the United States Supreme Court held that opinions and conclusion...
The clocktower of plaintiff county\u27s courthouse buckled and collapsed into the courtroom below. C...
The recent Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals opinion, United States v. Barry Bonds , is a murky di...