Baker & Winkler’s target article is well-researched and thought-provoking, but I do have four points of contention: (1) The proposal to entrust elephants to traditional mahout culture has restricted elephants’ freedom of movement and reproduction and (ab)used them. (2) The concept of “indigenous” simultaneously reifies and denigrates the “noble savages”, privileging only human indigenous groups, ignoring nonhuman indigenes. (3) Most lifestyles have been globalized under consumer-economic and anthropocentric worldviews. (4) The fact that people (including mahouts) are part of nature does not mean they are benevolent, any more than cities, monocultures, or roads are
Baker & Winkler (B&W) describe the state of Asian elephant conservation, raising unique issues, and ...
featured an article by Michael Kremer and Charles Morcom, titled simply, “Elephants. ” As one would ...
Baker & Winkler (B&W) provide a comprehensive and systematic review of Thailand’s captive tourist el...
Baker & Winkler’s target article is well-researched and thought-provoking, but I do have four points...
Baker & Winkler make a welcome contribution to elephant conservation in Thailand in advocating a rol...
Baker & Winkler’s critique of Asian elephant tourism and conservation in Thailand has convinced me t...
Culling seems to be a cruel method of human interference in the lives of elephants. Culling is gener...
International audienceBaker & Winkler make a welcome contribution to elephant conservation in Thaila...
This article examines the development and implementation of a grass-roots elephant conservation prog...
Elephants, the largest terrestrial representatives of the animal kingdom, are highorder mammals ...
Baker & Winkler (B&W) propose rewilding Asian elephants in a model in which they are rescued, rehabi...
The question of elephant ‘management’, presented here as epitomizing the conflicts of interests betw...
Baker & Winkler (2020) point out the entanglement among free-living elephants, captive elephants, an...
Baker & Winkler (2020) propose restoring elephants to a state of “wildness” and a “life worth living...
Although ‘misinterpretations’ of the human-elephant relations were not always arbitrary and my infor...
Baker & Winkler (B&W) describe the state of Asian elephant conservation, raising unique issues, and ...
featured an article by Michael Kremer and Charles Morcom, titled simply, “Elephants. ” As one would ...
Baker & Winkler (B&W) provide a comprehensive and systematic review of Thailand’s captive tourist el...
Baker & Winkler’s target article is well-researched and thought-provoking, but I do have four points...
Baker & Winkler make a welcome contribution to elephant conservation in Thailand in advocating a rol...
Baker & Winkler’s critique of Asian elephant tourism and conservation in Thailand has convinced me t...
Culling seems to be a cruel method of human interference in the lives of elephants. Culling is gener...
International audienceBaker & Winkler make a welcome contribution to elephant conservation in Thaila...
This article examines the development and implementation of a grass-roots elephant conservation prog...
Elephants, the largest terrestrial representatives of the animal kingdom, are highorder mammals ...
Baker & Winkler (B&W) propose rewilding Asian elephants in a model in which they are rescued, rehabi...
The question of elephant ‘management’, presented here as epitomizing the conflicts of interests betw...
Baker & Winkler (2020) point out the entanglement among free-living elephants, captive elephants, an...
Baker & Winkler (2020) propose restoring elephants to a state of “wildness” and a “life worth living...
Although ‘misinterpretations’ of the human-elephant relations were not always arbitrary and my infor...
Baker & Winkler (B&W) describe the state of Asian elephant conservation, raising unique issues, and ...
featured an article by Michael Kremer and Charles Morcom, titled simply, “Elephants. ” As one would ...
Baker & Winkler (B&W) provide a comprehensive and systematic review of Thailand’s captive tourist el...