Records of the 1971-76 federal-state Animal Damage Control (ADC) program in central Texas reflected 0.27% annual domestic sheep and goat losses to predators despite intensive control efforts. Sheep and goat numbers decreased, but their value, cattle numbers, and cattle values increased. Losses to coyotes and bobcats were proportionately greatest in brushy, uneven terrain on the periphery of the Edwards Plateau. In 1975, cooperative ADC predator control efforts protected 438,649 (40%) of the sheep and goats on 8,912 km2 (3,441 mi2), or 15.5% of the total land area in 21 counties studied at an average cost of 46 cents for each sheep or goat protected. Heaviest losses to predators occurred from October to May when small lambs were present; con...
Excerpts from the report: Coyotes are a major cause of sheep loss in the western United States. Th...
Predation of livestock and big game remains a matter of concern for ranch managers and operators in ...
Predation can impose signifi cant costs on agricul-tural producers in range livestock systems. Lives...
Predator control was conducted in South Texas during January-July 1975 and 1976 to determine its eff...
A Great Basin band of open range herded sheep was monitored intensively for losses between June 8 an...
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 46-49)The effects of mammalian predator control on (1) t...
Loss of livestock to predators is the primary justification for predator control programs in Oregon....
A historical review of predatory animal damage and the development of the Texas animal damage contro...
During 1980, 101 ranchers in 3 counties (Bosque, Hamilton, and Coryell) in Texas, were interviewed r...
Predation at the University of California Hopland Field Station was evaluated for an 11-year period ...
The average reported sheep and goat loss to coyotes (Canis latrans) in 1992 on those properties work...
The purpose of this study was to gather information regarding the application and economic implicati...
Ten sheep ranches in southwestern Utah were chosen for a verification study of sheep losses during 1...
A survey was conducted by the New Mexico Department of Agriculture in early 1984 to determine costs ...
One hundred thirty-two coyotes, 27 opossums, 22 skunks, 18 bobcats, 15 raccoons, 12 badgers, and one...
Excerpts from the report: Coyotes are a major cause of sheep loss in the western United States. Th...
Predation of livestock and big game remains a matter of concern for ranch managers and operators in ...
Predation can impose signifi cant costs on agricul-tural producers in range livestock systems. Lives...
Predator control was conducted in South Texas during January-July 1975 and 1976 to determine its eff...
A Great Basin band of open range herded sheep was monitored intensively for losses between June 8 an...
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 46-49)The effects of mammalian predator control on (1) t...
Loss of livestock to predators is the primary justification for predator control programs in Oregon....
A historical review of predatory animal damage and the development of the Texas animal damage contro...
During 1980, 101 ranchers in 3 counties (Bosque, Hamilton, and Coryell) in Texas, were interviewed r...
Predation at the University of California Hopland Field Station was evaluated for an 11-year period ...
The average reported sheep and goat loss to coyotes (Canis latrans) in 1992 on those properties work...
The purpose of this study was to gather information regarding the application and economic implicati...
Ten sheep ranches in southwestern Utah were chosen for a verification study of sheep losses during 1...
A survey was conducted by the New Mexico Department of Agriculture in early 1984 to determine costs ...
One hundred thirty-two coyotes, 27 opossums, 22 skunks, 18 bobcats, 15 raccoons, 12 badgers, and one...
Excerpts from the report: Coyotes are a major cause of sheep loss in the western United States. Th...
Predation of livestock and big game remains a matter of concern for ranch managers and operators in ...
Predation can impose signifi cant costs on agricul-tural producers in range livestock systems. Lives...