Add to ORKGThe various circuit courts of appeal have been unable to agree on the appropriate method of determining when one computer program infringes the copyright in another computer program. This article traces the differences among the circuits, proposes a model to explain what courts are doing, asserts a set of factors that simplify the analysis of determining copyright infringement, and tests those factors against seemingly irreconcilable cases. Finally, the article applies the analysis to unresolved computer software issues of today in order to predict likely outcomes
A conflict exists between copyright law and antitrust policy. The conflict arises because pursuant t...
In MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc. the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that Peak commit...
Drawing on recent work by Dan Burk and Mark Lemley in the patent context, this paper explores the ex...
The various circuit courts of appeal have been unable to agree on the appropriate method of determin...
Since Congress\u27s express acknowledgment of copyright protection for computer programs in 1980, co...
This article examines the issues surrounding software copyright protection and the problem of incons...
Courts focus on the Substantial Similarity test to determine copyright infringement. They also use t...
The non-literal elements of a computer program, such as its user interface, are crucial in determini...
Canadian computer program copyright infringement decisions are' characterized by prolix reasoning an...
The Supreme Court\u27s landmark ruling Lotus Development Corp vs Paperback Software International ...
Computer systems, especially those in heavy-use commercial settings, often require routine maintenan...
This Note presents the areas in which the copyrightability of a computer program has been questioned...
This brief amicus curiae was submitted by a group of copyright professors to the United States Court...
The author approaches the problem of software patents from the perspective of copyright, where the d...
In Apple Computer Co. v. Franklin Computer, Inc., 714 F.2d 1240 (3d Cir. 1983), the United States Co...
A conflict exists between copyright law and antitrust policy. The conflict arises because pursuant t...
In MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc. the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that Peak commit...
Drawing on recent work by Dan Burk and Mark Lemley in the patent context, this paper explores the ex...
The various circuit courts of appeal have been unable to agree on the appropriate method of determin...
Since Congress\u27s express acknowledgment of copyright protection for computer programs in 1980, co...
This article examines the issues surrounding software copyright protection and the problem of incons...
Courts focus on the Substantial Similarity test to determine copyright infringement. They also use t...
The non-literal elements of a computer program, such as its user interface, are crucial in determini...
Canadian computer program copyright infringement decisions are' characterized by prolix reasoning an...
The Supreme Court\u27s landmark ruling Lotus Development Corp vs Paperback Software International ...
Computer systems, especially those in heavy-use commercial settings, often require routine maintenan...
This Note presents the areas in which the copyrightability of a computer program has been questioned...
This brief amicus curiae was submitted by a group of copyright professors to the United States Court...
The author approaches the problem of software patents from the perspective of copyright, where the d...
In Apple Computer Co. v. Franklin Computer, Inc., 714 F.2d 1240 (3d Cir. 1983), the United States Co...
A conflict exists between copyright law and antitrust policy. The conflict arises because pursuant t...
In MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc. the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that Peak commit...
Drawing on recent work by Dan Burk and Mark Lemley in the patent context, this paper explores the ex...