The analysis of the high end of citation distributions represented by its tail provides important supplementary information on the citation profile of the unit under study. The proposed application of characteristic scores and scales provides four performance classes that are not sensitive to ties and ensures the seamless integration of measures of outstanding and even extreme performance into the standard tools of scientometric performance assessment. While the applicability of this method was already demonstrated for cross-national comparison (Glänzel, 2013b), the present study focuses on its application at the institutional level.status: publishe
The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between citation ranking and peer evaluatio...
The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between citation ranking and peer evaluatio...
This paper focuses on the evaluation of research institutions in terms of size-independent indicator...
The analysis of the high end of citation distributions represented by its tail provides important su...
The analysis of the high end of citation distributions represented by its tail provides important su...
A common problem in comparative bibliometric studies at the meso and micro level is the differentiat...
The analysis of the high end of citation distributions represented by its tail provides important su...
We propose a new performance indicator to evaluate the productivity of research institutions by thei...
The main theme of the thesis is assessment of institutional research performance. It is a theme of g...
This paper investigates the potential expansion of an indicator set for research performance evaluat...
This book deals with the evaluation of scholarly research performance, and focuses on the contributi...
We advocate a scientometric, top-down and institution-based research-assessment methodology that is ...
Scientific performance is often evaluated by bibliometric indicators such as publication counts or c...
Conventional scientometric predictors of research performance such as the number of papers, citation...
We present two families of indicators based on measures of actors' activity in classes of citation s...
The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between citation ranking and peer evaluatio...
The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between citation ranking and peer evaluatio...
This paper focuses on the evaluation of research institutions in terms of size-independent indicator...
The analysis of the high end of citation distributions represented by its tail provides important su...
The analysis of the high end of citation distributions represented by its tail provides important su...
A common problem in comparative bibliometric studies at the meso and micro level is the differentiat...
The analysis of the high end of citation distributions represented by its tail provides important su...
We propose a new performance indicator to evaluate the productivity of research institutions by thei...
The main theme of the thesis is assessment of institutional research performance. It is a theme of g...
This paper investigates the potential expansion of an indicator set for research performance evaluat...
This book deals with the evaluation of scholarly research performance, and focuses on the contributi...
We advocate a scientometric, top-down and institution-based research-assessment methodology that is ...
Scientific performance is often evaluated by bibliometric indicators such as publication counts or c...
Conventional scientometric predictors of research performance such as the number of papers, citation...
We present two families of indicators based on measures of actors' activity in classes of citation s...
The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between citation ranking and peer evaluatio...
The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between citation ranking and peer evaluatio...
This paper focuses on the evaluation of research institutions in terms of size-independent indicator...