We examine how Big 4 auditors compete for new private clients. We find evidence suggesting that Big 4 auditors offer fee discounts to attract non-Big 4 private clients to experience attributes of their brand name audit services. We also find that to attract clients from competing Big 4 suppliers, Big 4 auditors target fee discounts at clients in industries where they are the market leader. Our results further indicate that the Big 4 industry leaders target fee discounts to fast-growing clients and are able to charge these clients significant price fee increases in the second mandate period (after 3 years).status: publishe
SUMMARY: This paper examines IPO audit fees to assess the use of industry special-ization as a diffe...
In this paper we present and test an applied theory of auditor industry specialization. We use our t...
Ongoing debates within the professional and academic communities have raised a number of questions s...
We examine how Big 4 auditors compete for new private clients. We find evidence suggesting that Big ...
The recent investigation of the UK audit market by the Competition Commission testifies to perennial...
This study presents new evidence on the effects of auditor changes on audit pricing, with a particul...
We respond to calls for research into the effect of the decline in the number of Big N firms on mark...
International audienceWe empirically evaluate the degree to which Big 4 auditors achieve economies o...
The dissertation investigates Big 4 audit fee premiums for industry specialization based on samples ...
This paper studies whether and how Big-4 firms provide higher-quality audits than non-Big-4 firms. S...
This study investigates the existence of anticompetitive behaviour and cartel pricing by the Big4 in...
This paper examines auditors ’ market share and auditor dominance in China’s audit market with a foc...
The US Government Accountability Office (GAO) studied concentration in the audit market and found th...
It is a global phenomenon that more than 75% of a developed country's listed companies are clients o...
Big 4 auditors’ premium charged by the Big 4 auditors has found to have important influence on fees ...
SUMMARY: This paper examines IPO audit fees to assess the use of industry special-ization as a diffe...
In this paper we present and test an applied theory of auditor industry specialization. We use our t...
Ongoing debates within the professional and academic communities have raised a number of questions s...
We examine how Big 4 auditors compete for new private clients. We find evidence suggesting that Big ...
The recent investigation of the UK audit market by the Competition Commission testifies to perennial...
This study presents new evidence on the effects of auditor changes on audit pricing, with a particul...
We respond to calls for research into the effect of the decline in the number of Big N firms on mark...
International audienceWe empirically evaluate the degree to which Big 4 auditors achieve economies o...
The dissertation investigates Big 4 audit fee premiums for industry specialization based on samples ...
This paper studies whether and how Big-4 firms provide higher-quality audits than non-Big-4 firms. S...
This study investigates the existence of anticompetitive behaviour and cartel pricing by the Big4 in...
This paper examines auditors ’ market share and auditor dominance in China’s audit market with a foc...
The US Government Accountability Office (GAO) studied concentration in the audit market and found th...
It is a global phenomenon that more than 75% of a developed country's listed companies are clients o...
Big 4 auditors’ premium charged by the Big 4 auditors has found to have important influence on fees ...
SUMMARY: This paper examines IPO audit fees to assess the use of industry special-ization as a diffe...
In this paper we present and test an applied theory of auditor industry specialization. We use our t...
Ongoing debates within the professional and academic communities have raised a number of questions s...