In May 2018, UNC Libraries purchased a report from 1Science which listed 47,000 articles authored by UNC researchers. Although the vendor characterized the report as an out-of-the-box tool designed to fill an institutional repository, we found that it would take significant work to make it usable for the Carolina Digital Repository (CDR). In this presentation, we will discuss the issues that we identified, including scripting errors, inconsistent metadata and rights concerns. We will describe the plans and processes to fix these issues. Additionally, we will address best practices for uploads and future plans
This article has been developed from our UKSG Conference breakout session ‘What is all this fuss abo...
Metadata documentation is extremely important for maintaining any digital collection. At its core, t...
As more libraries adopt digital preservation platforms or contribute material to multi-institutional...
Poster presented at Open Repositories 2015 in Indianapolis, INThe distributed nature of many reposit...
presentationPresentation given at the ALCTS Cataloging Norms Interest Group meeting at the American ...
In Scholars’ Mine, we have heavily customized the metadata in our series, event communities, journal...
Article on metadata quality assurance and the experience of the University of North Texas (UNT) Libr...
Implemented as a way to host open-access journals, the University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV) Librari...
This presentation was given during the International Conference on Dublin Core & Metadata Applicatio...
Slides from a presentation discussing the integration of support for data set sharing and management...
This chapter describes the issues confronted along the “road taken” by a technical services team as ...
Slides from a presentation on metadata basics for library projects. Delivered October 6, 2011 at the...
Paper presented at the NELINET Annual Bibliographic Services Conference, Worcester, Massachusetts, N...
Digital Commons has done a pretty good job at keeping its metadata forms user friendly. First, the ...
This paper was published in the conference proceedings for the International Conference on Dublin Co...
This article has been developed from our UKSG Conference breakout session ‘What is all this fuss abo...
Metadata documentation is extremely important for maintaining any digital collection. At its core, t...
As more libraries adopt digital preservation platforms or contribute material to multi-institutional...
Poster presented at Open Repositories 2015 in Indianapolis, INThe distributed nature of many reposit...
presentationPresentation given at the ALCTS Cataloging Norms Interest Group meeting at the American ...
In Scholars’ Mine, we have heavily customized the metadata in our series, event communities, journal...
Article on metadata quality assurance and the experience of the University of North Texas (UNT) Libr...
Implemented as a way to host open-access journals, the University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV) Librari...
This presentation was given during the International Conference on Dublin Core & Metadata Applicatio...
Slides from a presentation discussing the integration of support for data set sharing and management...
This chapter describes the issues confronted along the “road taken” by a technical services team as ...
Slides from a presentation on metadata basics for library projects. Delivered October 6, 2011 at the...
Paper presented at the NELINET Annual Bibliographic Services Conference, Worcester, Massachusetts, N...
Digital Commons has done a pretty good job at keeping its metadata forms user friendly. First, the ...
This paper was published in the conference proceedings for the International Conference on Dublin Co...
This article has been developed from our UKSG Conference breakout session ‘What is all this fuss abo...
Metadata documentation is extremely important for maintaining any digital collection. At its core, t...
As more libraries adopt digital preservation platforms or contribute material to multi-institutional...