Mammographic Interpretive Volume and Diagnostic Mammogram Interpretation Performance in Community Practice

Do Mammographic Technologists Affect Radiologists’ Diagnostic Mammography Interpretative Performance?

Henderson, Louise M.
Benefield, Thad
Michael Bowling, J.
Durham, Danielle D.
Marsh, Mary W.
Schroeder, Bruce F.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.

January 2015

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the technologist has an effect on the radiologist...

Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation

Gard, Charlotte C
Aiello Bowles, Erin J
Miglioretti, Diana L
Taplin, Stephen H
Rutter, Carolyn M

September 2015

USA states have begun legislating mammographic breast density reporting to women, requiring that wom...

Observer Performance Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography

Suleiman, Wasfi

January 2016

Aims: Errors and variability in mammography interpretation is well established, however factors resp...

Mammographic Interpretive Volume and Diagnostic Mammogram Interpretation Performance in Community Practice

Haneuse, Sebastien
Buist, Diana S. M.
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Anderson, Melissa L.
Carney, Patricia A.
Onega, Tracy
Geller, Berta M.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Rosenberg, Robert D.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Elmore, Joann G.
Taplin, Stephen H.
Smith, Robert A.
Sickles, Edward A.

January 2012

To investigate the association between radiologist interpretive volume and diagnostic mammography pe...

Influence of Annual Interpretive Volume on Screening Mammography Performance in the United States

Buist, Diana S. M.
Anderson, Melissa L.
Haneuse, Sebastien J. P. A.
Sickles, Edward A.
Smith, Robert A.
Carney, Patricia A.
Taplin, Stephen H.
Rosenberg, Robert D.
Geller, Berta M.
Onega, Tracy L.
Monsees, Barbara S.
Bassett, Lawrence W.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Elmore, Joann G.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Miglioretti, Diana L.

January 2011

To examine whether U.S. radiologists’ interpretive volume affects their screening mammography perfor...

Reported Mammographic Density: Film-Screen versus Digital Acquisition

Harvey, Jennifer A.
Gard, Charlotte C.
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Buist, Diana S. M.
Geller, Berta A.
Onega, Tracy L.

January 2013

To test the hypothesis that American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (...

Variability in Interpretive Performance at Screening Mammography and Radiologists’ Characteristics Associated with Accuracy

Elmore, Joann G.
Jackson, Sara L.
Abraham, Linn
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Carney, Patricia A.
Geller, Berta M.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Onega, Tracy
Rosenberg, Robert D.
Sickles, Edward A.
Buist, Diana S. M.

January 2009

To identify radiologists’ characteristics associated with interpretive performance in screening mamm...

Radiologist and image characteristics that affect the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis

Rawashdeh, Mohammad

January 2015

Aims Variations in the performance of mammography readers are well reported, but key lesion and re...

Effect of Radiologists’ Diagnostic Work-up Volume on Interpretive Performance

Buist, Diana S. M.
Anderson, Melissa L.
Smith, Robert A.
Carney, Patricia A.
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Monsees, Barbara S.
Sickles, Edward A.
Taplin, Stephen H.
Geller, Berta M.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Onega, Tracy L.

January 2014

We found that radiologists with a higher annual volume of work-ups for recalled screening mammograms...

Radiologist Agreement for Mammographic Recall by Case Difficulty and Finding Type

Onega, Tracy
Smith, Megan
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Carney, Patricia A.
Geller, Berta A.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Buist, Diana S.M.
Rosenberg, Robert D.
Smith, Robert A.
Sickles, Edward A.
Haneuse, Sebastien
Anderson, Melissa L.
Yankaskas, Bonnie

January 2012

To assess agreement of mammography interpretations by community radiologists with consensus interpre...

The Influence of Mammographic Technologists on Radiologists' Ability to Interpret Screening Mammograms in Community Practice

Henderson, Louise M.
Benefield, Thad
Marsh, Mary W.
Schroeder, Bruce F.
Durham, Danielle D.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Bowling, J. Michael

January 2015

To determine whether the mammographic technologist has an effect on the radiologists’ interpretative...

ARTICLES Association of Volume and Volume-Independent Factors With Accuracy in Screening Mammogram Interpretation

Craig A. Beam
Emily F. Conant
Edward A. Sickles

July 2015

Background: Early detection of breast cancer is associated with the accurate reading of screening ma...

Mammographic Density Estimation: Comparison Between Radiologist’s Visual Assessment and Volpara Breast Density

고수연
김민정
김은경
문희정

January 2012

Purpose : To retrospectively compare Volpara mammographic density estimation with the density by rad...

Effect of Observing Change from Comparison Mammograms on Performance of Screening Mammography in a Large Community-based Population

Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
May, Ryan C.
Matuszewski, Jeanine
Bowling, J. Michael
Jarman, Molly P.
Schroeder, Bruce F.

January 2011

To evaluate the effect of comparison mammograms on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive pred...

Optimum screening mammography reading volumes : evidence from the NHS Breast Screening Programme

Cornford, Eleanor
Cheung, Shan
Press, Mike
Kearins, Olive
Taylor-Phillips, Sian

September 2021

Objectives Minimum caseload standards for professionals examining breast screening mammograms vary ...

Do Mammographic Technologists Affect Radiologists’ Diagnostic Mammography Interpretative Performance?

Henderson, Louise M.
Benefield, Thad
Michael Bowling, J.
Durham, Danielle D.
Marsh, Mary W.
Schroeder, Bruce F.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.

January 2015

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the technologist has an effect on the radiologist...

Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation

Gard, Charlotte C
Aiello Bowles, Erin J
Miglioretti, Diana L
Taplin, Stephen H
Rutter, Carolyn M

September 2015

USA states have begun legislating mammographic breast density reporting to women, requiring that wom...

Observer Performance Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography

Suleiman, Wasfi

January 2016

Aims: Errors and variability in mammography interpretation is well established, however factors resp...

Mammographic Interpretive Volume and Diagnostic Mammogram Interpretation Performance in Community Practice

Haneuse, Sebastien
Buist, Diana S. M.
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Anderson, Melissa L.
Carney, Patricia A.
Onega, Tracy
Geller, Berta M.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Rosenberg, Robert D.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Elmore, Joann G.
Taplin, Stephen H.
Smith, Robert A.
Sickles, Edward A.

January 2012

To investigate the association between radiologist interpretive volume and diagnostic mammography pe...

Influence of Annual Interpretive Volume on Screening Mammography Performance in the United States

Buist, Diana S. M.
Anderson, Melissa L.
Haneuse, Sebastien J. P. A.
Sickles, Edward A.
Smith, Robert A.
Carney, Patricia A.
Taplin, Stephen H.
Rosenberg, Robert D.
Geller, Berta M.
Onega, Tracy L.
Monsees, Barbara S.
Bassett, Lawrence W.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Elmore, Joann G.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Miglioretti, Diana L.

January 2011

To examine whether U.S. radiologists’ interpretive volume affects their screening mammography perfor...

Reported Mammographic Density: Film-Screen versus Digital Acquisition

Harvey, Jennifer A.
Gard, Charlotte C.
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Buist, Diana S. M.
Geller, Berta A.
Onega, Tracy L.

January 2013

To test the hypothesis that American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (...

Variability in Interpretive Performance at Screening Mammography and Radiologists’ Characteristics Associated with Accuracy

Elmore, Joann G.
Jackson, Sara L.
Abraham, Linn
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Carney, Patricia A.
Geller, Berta M.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Onega, Tracy
Rosenberg, Robert D.
Sickles, Edward A.
Buist, Diana S. M.

January 2009

To identify radiologists’ characteristics associated with interpretive performance in screening mamm...

Radiologist and image characteristics that affect the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis

Rawashdeh, Mohammad

January 2015

Aims Variations in the performance of mammography readers are well reported, but key lesion and re...

Effect of Radiologists’ Diagnostic Work-up Volume on Interpretive Performance

Buist, Diana S. M.
Anderson, Melissa L.
Smith, Robert A.
Carney, Patricia A.
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Monsees, Barbara S.
Sickles, Edward A.
Taplin, Stephen H.
Geller, Berta M.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Onega, Tracy L.

January 2014

We found that radiologists with a higher annual volume of work-ups for recalled screening mammograms...

Radiologist Agreement for Mammographic Recall by Case Difficulty and Finding Type

Onega, Tracy
Smith, Megan
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Carney, Patricia A.
Geller, Berta A.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Buist, Diana S.M.
Rosenberg, Robert D.
Smith, Robert A.
Sickles, Edward A.
Haneuse, Sebastien
Anderson, Melissa L.
Yankaskas, Bonnie

January 2012

To assess agreement of mammography interpretations by community radiologists with consensus interpre...

The Influence of Mammographic Technologists on Radiologists' Ability to Interpret Screening Mammograms in Community Practice

Henderson, Louise M.
Benefield, Thad
Marsh, Mary W.
Schroeder, Bruce F.
Durham, Danielle D.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Bowling, J. Michael

January 2015

To determine whether the mammographic technologist has an effect on the radiologists’ interpretative...

ARTICLES Association of Volume and Volume-Independent Factors With Accuracy in Screening Mammogram Interpretation

Craig A. Beam
Emily F. Conant
Edward A. Sickles

July 2015

Background: Early detection of breast cancer is associated with the accurate reading of screening ma...

Mammographic Density Estimation: Comparison Between Radiologist’s Visual Assessment and Volpara Breast Density

고수연
김민정
김은경
문희정

January 2012

Purpose : To retrospectively compare Volpara mammographic density estimation with the density by rad...

Effect of Observing Change from Comparison Mammograms on Performance of Screening Mammography in a Large Community-based Population

Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
May, Ryan C.
Matuszewski, Jeanine
Bowling, J. Michael
Jarman, Molly P.
Schroeder, Bruce F.

January 2011

To evaluate the effect of comparison mammograms on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive pred...

Optimum screening mammography reading volumes : evidence from the NHS Breast Screening Programme

Cornford, Eleanor
Cheung, Shan
Press, Mike
Kearins, Olive
Taylor-Phillips, Sian

September 2021

Objectives Minimum caseload standards for professionals examining breast screening mammograms vary ...

Do Mammographic Technologists Affect Radiologists’ Diagnostic Mammography Interpretative Performance?

Henderson, Louise M.
Benefield, Thad
Michael Bowling, J.
Durham, Danielle D.
Marsh, Mary W.
Schroeder, Bruce F.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.

January 2015

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the technologist has an effect on the radiologist...

Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation

Gard, Charlotte C
Aiello Bowles, Erin J
Miglioretti, Diana L
Taplin, Stephen H
Rutter, Carolyn M

September 2015

USA states have begun legislating mammographic breast density reporting to women, requiring that wom...

Observer Performance Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography

Suleiman, Wasfi

January 2016

Aims: Errors and variability in mammography interpretation is well established, however factors resp...

Mammographic Interpretive Volume and Diagnostic Mammogram Interpretation Performance in Community Practice

Abstract

Extracted data

Mammographic Interpretive Volume and Diagnostic Mammogram Interpretation Performance in Community Practice

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items