Return of individual research results from genomic studies is a hotly debated ethical issue in genomic research. However, the perspective of key stakeholders—Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviewers—has been missing from this dialogue. This study explores the positions and experiences of IRB members and staff regarding this issue
We examined the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process at 9 academic institutions in the electroni...
We examined the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process at 9 academic institutions in the electroni...
Purpose: Whether researchers have an obligation to disclose genetic incidental findings (GIFs) to re...
Return of individual research results from genomic studies is a hotly debated ethical issue in genom...
Despite the plethora of empirical studies conducted to date, debate continues about whether and to w...
Despite the plethora of empirical studies conducted to date, debate continues about whether and to w...
Funder: Franca FundFunder: Canada Research Chair in Law and MedicineFunder: Canada Institute of Heal...
Despite the plethora of empirical studies conducted to date, debate continues about whether and to w...
Despite the plethora of empirical studies conducted to date, debate continues about whether and to w...
one or more positive consequences. Respondents who had served on an IRB were about 80 % more likely ...
Funder: Canada Research Chair in Law and MedicineFunder: Genome QuebecFunder: Genome Canada; funder-...
Background: Clinical investigators are increasingly facing decisions about returning individual rese...
As more research studies incorporate next-generation sequencing (including whole-genome or whole-exo...
As more research studies incorporate next-generation sequencing (including whole-genome or whole-exo...
We examined the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process at 9 academic institutions in the electroni...
We examined the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process at 9 academic institutions in the electroni...
We examined the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process at 9 academic institutions in the electroni...
Purpose: Whether researchers have an obligation to disclose genetic incidental findings (GIFs) to re...
Return of individual research results from genomic studies is a hotly debated ethical issue in genom...
Despite the plethora of empirical studies conducted to date, debate continues about whether and to w...
Despite the plethora of empirical studies conducted to date, debate continues about whether and to w...
Funder: Franca FundFunder: Canada Research Chair in Law and MedicineFunder: Canada Institute of Heal...
Despite the plethora of empirical studies conducted to date, debate continues about whether and to w...
Despite the plethora of empirical studies conducted to date, debate continues about whether and to w...
one or more positive consequences. Respondents who had served on an IRB were about 80 % more likely ...
Funder: Canada Research Chair in Law and MedicineFunder: Genome QuebecFunder: Genome Canada; funder-...
Background: Clinical investigators are increasingly facing decisions about returning individual rese...
As more research studies incorporate next-generation sequencing (including whole-genome or whole-exo...
As more research studies incorporate next-generation sequencing (including whole-genome or whole-exo...
We examined the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process at 9 academic institutions in the electroni...
We examined the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process at 9 academic institutions in the electroni...
We examined the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process at 9 academic institutions in the electroni...
Purpose: Whether researchers have an obligation to disclose genetic incidental findings (GIFs) to re...