Radiologists' Perceptions of Computer Aided Detection Versus Double Reading for Mammography Interpretation

The Influence of Mammographic Technologists on Radiologists' Ability to Interpret Screening Mammograms in Community Practice

Henderson, Louise M.
Benefield, Thad
Marsh, Mary W.
Schroeder, Bruce F.
Durham, Danielle D.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Bowling, J. Michael

January 2015

To determine whether the mammographic technologist has an effect on the radiologists’ interpretative...

Variability in Interpretive Performance at Screening Mammography and Radiologists’ Characteristics Associated with Accuracy

Elmore, Joann G.
Jackson, Sara L.
Abraham, Linn
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Carney, Patricia A.
Geller, Berta M.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Onega, Tracy
Rosenberg, Robert D.
Sickles, Edward A.
Buist, Diana S. M.

January 2009

To identify radiologists’ characteristics associated with interpretive performance in screening mamm...

Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: Effects on a biennial screening programme outcome

Duijm, LEM
Groenewoud, JH
Fracheboud, Jacques
van Ineveld, Martin
Roumen, RMH
de Koning, Harry

January 2008

Purpose: To determine the effect of introducing radiographer double reading, in addition to standard...

Radiologists' Perceptions of Computer Aided Detection Versus Double Reading for Mammography Interpretation

Onega, Tracy
Aiello Bowles, Erin J.
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Carney, Patricia A.
Geller, Berta M.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Sickles, Edward A.
Elmore, Joann G.

January 2010

To examine radiologists’ use and perceptions of computer-aided detection (CAD) and double reading fo...

Improving mammographic interpretation: Double reading and computer-aided diagnosis

Helvie, Mark

This article discusses two commonly used techniques advocated to improve screening mammography perfo...

Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms.

Karssemeijer, N.
Otten, J.D.M.
Verbeek, A.L.M.
Groenewoud, J.H.
Koning, H.J. de
Hendriks, J.H.C.L.
Holland, R.

January 2003

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: To evaluate the use of a computer-aided detection (CAD) syste...

Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists

van den Biggelaar, Frank J. H. M.
Kessels, Alphons G. H.
van Engelshoven, Jos M. A.
Boetes, Carla
Flobbe, Karin

April 2010

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system on th...

Computer-aided diagnosis with temporal analysis to improve radiologists' interpretation of mammographic mass lesions.

Timp, S.
Varela, C.
Karssemeijer, N.

January 2010

Contains fulltext : 89520.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)The purpose of...

Standalone computer-aided detection compared to radiologists' performance for the detection of mammographic masses

Hupse, Rianne
Samulski, Maurice
Lobbes, Marc
den Heeten, Ard
Imhof-Tas, Mechli W.
Beijerinck, David
Pijnappel, Ruud
Boetes, Carla
Karssemeijer, Nico

January 2013

We developed a computer-aided detection (CAD) system aimed at decision support for detection of mali...

Mammography is currently the most sensitive method for detecting early breast cancer, and it is al...

Lubomir Hadjiiski
Mark A. Helvie
Berkman Sahiner
Heang-ping Chan
Marilyn A. Roubidoux
Alexis Nees
Nicholas Petricka
Caroline Blane
Chintana Paramagul
Janet Bailey
Stephanie Patterson
Katherine Klein
Dorit Adler
Michelle Foster
Joseph Shen

August 2016

We have previously evaluated the effects of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) on radiologists ’ charact...

Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: Impact on screening performance parameters

Duijm, Lucien
Groenewoud, Hanny
Fracheboud, Jacques
Koning, Harry

August 2007

textabstractBackground: Studies have shown that having mammography technologists review screening ma...

Incorporation of the technologist's opinion for arbitration of discrepant assessments among radiologists at screening mammography

Coolen, Angela M. P.
Lameijer, Joost R. C.
Voogd, Adri C.
Strobbe, Luc J.
Louwman, Marieke W. J.
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
Duijm, Lucien E. M.

August 2018

We determined whether the addition of the technologist's opinion may be helpful in deciding if disco...

Diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without different CAD systems for mammography

Lauria, A
Fantacci, ME
Bottigli, U
Delogu, P
Fauci, F
Golosio, B
Indovina, PL
Masala, GL
Oliva, P
Palmiero, R
Raso, G
Stumbo, S
Tangaro, S

July 2003

6 pages, 3 figures; to appear in the Proceedings of The International Society for Optical Engineerin...

Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display

Pisano, Etta D.
Cole, Elodia B.
Major, Stacey
Zong, Shuquan
Hemminger, Bradley M.
Muller, Keith E.
Johnston, R. Eugene
Walsh, Ruth
Conant, Emily
Fajardo, Laurie L.
Feig, Stephen A.
Nishikawa, Robert M.
Yaffe, Martin J.
Williams, Mark B.
Aylward, Stephen

January 2000

PURPOSE: To determine the preferences of radiologists among eight different image processing algorit...

Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection

Lehman, Constance D
Wellman, Robert D
Buist, Diana SM
Kerlikowske, Karla
Tosteson, Anna NA
Miglioretti, Diana L

November 2015

ImportanceAfter the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved computer-aided detection (CAD) fo...

The Influence of Mammographic Technologists on Radiologists' Ability to Interpret Screening Mammograms in Community Practice

Henderson, Louise M.
Benefield, Thad
Marsh, Mary W.
Schroeder, Bruce F.
Durham, Danielle D.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Bowling, J. Michael

January 2015

To determine whether the mammographic technologist has an effect on the radiologists’ interpretative...

Variability in Interpretive Performance at Screening Mammography and Radiologists’ Characteristics Associated with Accuracy

Elmore, Joann G.
Jackson, Sara L.
Abraham, Linn
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Carney, Patricia A.
Geller, Berta M.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Onega, Tracy
Rosenberg, Robert D.
Sickles, Edward A.
Buist, Diana S. M.

January 2009

To identify radiologists’ characteristics associated with interpretive performance in screening mamm...

Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: Effects on a biennial screening programme outcome

Duijm, LEM
Groenewoud, JH
Fracheboud, Jacques
van Ineveld, Martin
Roumen, RMH
de Koning, Harry

January 2008

Purpose: To determine the effect of introducing radiographer double reading, in addition to standard...

Radiologists' Perceptions of Computer Aided Detection Versus Double Reading for Mammography Interpretation

Onega, Tracy
Aiello Bowles, Erin J.
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Carney, Patricia A.
Geller, Berta M.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Sickles, Edward A.
Elmore, Joann G.

January 2010

To examine radiologists’ use and perceptions of computer-aided detection (CAD) and double reading fo...

Improving mammographic interpretation: Double reading and computer-aided diagnosis

Helvie, Mark

This article discusses two commonly used techniques advocated to improve screening mammography perfo...

Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms.

Karssemeijer, N.
Otten, J.D.M.
Verbeek, A.L.M.
Groenewoud, J.H.
Koning, H.J. de
Hendriks, J.H.C.L.
Holland, R.

January 2003

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: To evaluate the use of a computer-aided detection (CAD) syste...

Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists

van den Biggelaar, Frank J. H. M.
Kessels, Alphons G. H.
van Engelshoven, Jos M. A.
Boetes, Carla
Flobbe, Karin

April 2010

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system on th...

Computer-aided diagnosis with temporal analysis to improve radiologists' interpretation of mammographic mass lesions.

Timp, S.
Varela, C.
Karssemeijer, N.

January 2010

Contains fulltext : 89520.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)The purpose of...

Standalone computer-aided detection compared to radiologists' performance for the detection of mammographic masses

Hupse, Rianne
Samulski, Maurice
Lobbes, Marc
den Heeten, Ard
Imhof-Tas, Mechli W.
Beijerinck, David
Pijnappel, Ruud
Boetes, Carla
Karssemeijer, Nico

January 2013

We developed a computer-aided detection (CAD) system aimed at decision support for detection of mali...

Mammography is currently the most sensitive method for detecting early breast cancer, and it is al...

Lubomir Hadjiiski
Mark A. Helvie
Berkman Sahiner
Heang-ping Chan
Marilyn A. Roubidoux
Alexis Nees
Nicholas Petricka
Caroline Blane
Chintana Paramagul
Janet Bailey
Stephanie Patterson
Katherine Klein
Dorit Adler
Michelle Foster
Joseph Shen

August 2016

We have previously evaluated the effects of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) on radiologists ’ charact...

Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: Impact on screening performance parameters

Duijm, Lucien
Groenewoud, Hanny
Fracheboud, Jacques
Koning, Harry

August 2007

textabstractBackground: Studies have shown that having mammography technologists review screening ma...

Incorporation of the technologist's opinion for arbitration of discrepant assessments among radiologists at screening mammography

Coolen, Angela M. P.
Lameijer, Joost R. C.
Voogd, Adri C.
Strobbe, Luc J.
Louwman, Marieke W. J.
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
Duijm, Lucien E. M.

August 2018

We determined whether the addition of the technologist's opinion may be helpful in deciding if disco...

Diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without different CAD systems for mammography

Lauria, A
Fantacci, ME
Bottigli, U
Delogu, P
Fauci, F
Golosio, B
Indovina, PL
Masala, GL
Oliva, P
Palmiero, R
Raso, G
Stumbo, S
Tangaro, S

July 2003

6 pages, 3 figures; to appear in the Proceedings of The International Society for Optical Engineerin...

Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display

Pisano, Etta D.
Cole, Elodia B.
Major, Stacey
Zong, Shuquan
Hemminger, Bradley M.
Muller, Keith E.
Johnston, R. Eugene
Walsh, Ruth
Conant, Emily
Fajardo, Laurie L.
Feig, Stephen A.
Nishikawa, Robert M.
Yaffe, Martin J.
Williams, Mark B.
Aylward, Stephen

January 2000

PURPOSE: To determine the preferences of radiologists among eight different image processing algorit...

Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection

Lehman, Constance D
Wellman, Robert D
Buist, Diana SM
Kerlikowske, Karla
Tosteson, Anna NA
Miglioretti, Diana L

November 2015

ImportanceAfter the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved computer-aided detection (CAD) fo...

The Influence of Mammographic Technologists on Radiologists' Ability to Interpret Screening Mammograms in Community Practice

Henderson, Louise M.
Benefield, Thad
Marsh, Mary W.
Schroeder, Bruce F.
Durham, Danielle D.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Bowling, J. Michael

January 2015

To determine whether the mammographic technologist has an effect on the radiologists’ interpretative...

Variability in Interpretive Performance at Screening Mammography and Radiologists’ Characteristics Associated with Accuracy

Elmore, Joann G.
Jackson, Sara L.
Abraham, Linn
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Carney, Patricia A.
Geller, Berta M.
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Onega, Tracy
Rosenberg, Robert D.
Sickles, Edward A.
Buist, Diana S. M.

January 2009

To identify radiologists’ characteristics associated with interpretive performance in screening mamm...

Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: Effects on a biennial screening programme outcome

Duijm, LEM
Groenewoud, JH
Fracheboud, Jacques
van Ineveld, Martin
Roumen, RMH
de Koning, Harry

January 2008

Purpose: To determine the effect of introducing radiographer double reading, in addition to standard...

Radiologists' Perceptions of Computer Aided Detection Versus Double Reading for Mammography Interpretation

Abstract

Extracted data

Radiologists' Perceptions of Computer Aided Detection Versus Double Reading for Mammography Interpretation

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items