Conflicts among constitutional rights and ways to solve them

This paper deals with the question of the conflict of constitutional rights which acknowledge basic rights. It is shown that there are two extreme accounts: the subsumptive approach and the particularist approach that embody two main conceptions of practical rationality. Between both approaches there is room for a range of options. Two of them are taken into account: the proportionalist approach, which conserves the scope of rights restricting their stringency, and it is argued in favour of the specificationist approach, which preserve the stringency of rights restricting their scope.En este trabajo se analiza la cuestión de la colisión entre principios constitucionales que reconocen derechos básicos. Se muestra que hay dos posiciones extremas: el enfoque subsuntivo y el enfoque particularista, que encarnan dos grandes concepciones de la racionalidad práctica. Entre ambos enfoques hay lugar para un amplio espectro de opciones. Se toman dos en cuenta: el enfoque proporcionalista, que conserva el alcance de los derechos restringiendo su fuerza y el enfoque especificacionista, a favor del cual se argumenta, que conserva la fuerza de los derechos restringiendo su alcance