In the realm of refugeeism, camps can be perceived as places that sustain the lives of displaced humans, vulnerable environments that contain passive recipients, or territories of sovereign power that enforce state-sanctioned limits on refugees’ freedoms. These three approaches, as observed by humanitarian agencies, media producers, and theorists do not only encompass camp’s control, and planning strategies, in the social, humanitarian, and political fields but also determine the participation of architecture in the discourse on emergency communities. Architecture incarnates the humanitarian essence in these type of shelters, the temporality of the camp in providing transitional housing, and the exclusion in the spatial and urban characteri...