In a judgment on 18 January 2018, the fifth Chamber of the ECtHR found no violation of the right to private and family life in Fédération Nationale des Syndicats Sportifs (FNASS) and Others v France. The case concerned the requirement for a “target group” of sports professionals to notify their whereabouts every day of the year so unannounced anti-doping tests can take place. The Court ruled that public interest grounds justified the “particularly intrusive” interference with the applicants’ privacy
According to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the Swedish law permitting the bulk interce...
Following a general overview of the EHCR case of law and some of its distinctive features, this arti...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found that a court order to anonymise an article in a new...
The new World Anti-Doping Agency Code came into effect on IS January 2009. It introduced a new inte...
Recent discussions among lawyers, philosophers, policy researchers and athletes have focused on thep...
Recent discussions among lawyers, philosophers, policy researchers and athletes have focused on the ...
Recent discussions among lawyers, philosophers, policy researchers and athletes have focused on the ...
In F\ue9d\ue9ration Nationale des Syndicats Sportifs (FNASS) and others v. France (judgment of 18 Ja...
This thesis will address the consistencies and inconsistencies of the EU legislation and the whereab...
This chapter presents a critical analysis of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECt...
In this Article, the author considers the judgment delivered April 16, 2002, by the European Court o...
In this article, we explain and reflect critically upon the athlete whereabouts reporting system in ...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a judgment on the rights and duties and res...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a judgment on the compatibility of the righ...
Article 8 ECHR was adopted as a classic negative right, which provides the citizen protection from u...
According to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the Swedish law permitting the bulk interce...
Following a general overview of the EHCR case of law and some of its distinctive features, this arti...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found that a court order to anonymise an article in a new...
The new World Anti-Doping Agency Code came into effect on IS January 2009. It introduced a new inte...
Recent discussions among lawyers, philosophers, policy researchers and athletes have focused on thep...
Recent discussions among lawyers, philosophers, policy researchers and athletes have focused on the ...
Recent discussions among lawyers, philosophers, policy researchers and athletes have focused on the ...
In F\ue9d\ue9ration Nationale des Syndicats Sportifs (FNASS) and others v. France (judgment of 18 Ja...
This thesis will address the consistencies and inconsistencies of the EU legislation and the whereab...
This chapter presents a critical analysis of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECt...
In this Article, the author considers the judgment delivered April 16, 2002, by the European Court o...
In this article, we explain and reflect critically upon the athlete whereabouts reporting system in ...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a judgment on the rights and duties and res...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a judgment on the compatibility of the righ...
Article 8 ECHR was adopted as a classic negative right, which provides the citizen protection from u...
According to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the Swedish law permitting the bulk interce...
Following a general overview of the EHCR case of law and some of its distinctive features, this arti...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found that a court order to anonymise an article in a new...