A molecular systematic investigation of the Acrochaetiales (Florideophycidae, Rhodophyta) and related taxa based on nuclear small-subunit ribosomal DNA sequence data

Small-subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU) sequences for 14 members of the rhodophyte order Acrochaetiales were used to generate phylogenetic trees to determine whether the Acrochaetiales is monophyletic and to assess the relationships of acrochaetioid algae to closely related taxa. Within the Acrochaetiales, two strongly supported groups are recognized: one group that includes, in addition to three other species, the type species of the genera Acrochaetium, Audouinella and Rhodochorton; and a second group that includes an unequivocal representative of Colaconema and nine additional species. The relationships of these groups with the Batrachospermales, Palmariales and Nemaliales were not resolved and the possibility that the Acrochaetiales is polyphyletic was not eliminated. Resolution of relationships for species within these groups was strong in only a few cases, with many of the phylogenetic issues at this level remaining equivocal. Our results do not position Camontagnea in the Acrochaetiales, as has recently been suggested, but strongly ally this genus to the family Rhodothamniellaceae of the Palmariales. The phylogenetic position of Rhododraparnaldia, an alga intermediate between the Acrochaetiales and Batrachospermales, remains unresolved. These molecular results provide a foundation for assessing the taxonomic significance of phenotypic characters (e.g. anatomy, life histories, morphology, phycoerythrin type and plastid details) variously considered taxonomically significant in the Acrochaetiales.Peer reviewedfinal article publishedBatrachospermalesAcrochaetialessmall-subunit rDNARhodophytaRhododraparnaldiaphylogenyPalmarialesNemalialesmolecular systematicsCamontagne