This chapter explores the syntactic status of relativizers, that is, what are standardly referred to as relative complementizers and relative pronouns, in Old and Modern Italian varieties and proposes a unified analysis for both types of items. It takes into account the ongoing debate regarding the categorial status of relativizers (Kayne 1975, 2008, 2010; Lehmann 1984; Manzini and Savoia 2003, 2011, among many others) and aims to show that what we call complementizers are not C° heads, as commonly assumed. Instead, we propose that both relative ‘complementizers’ and ‘pronouns’ have the same categorial status, that is, they are wh-items
Grammaticalization creates new grammatical exponents out of existing (lexical) ones. The standard as...
This paper considers the syntax of relative clauses in Germanic and Romance languages within the fra...
In this article I analyze the complementizer doubling construction attested in some early and modern...
This paper explores the syntactic status of che and (il) quale relativizers, i.e. what are standardl...
In this article we discuss evidence which suggests that the different uses of che in Modern and Old...
In this article we discuss evidence which suggests that the different uses of che in Modern and Old...
Old Italian had a system of wh pronouns with Case distinctions, which has been lost in modern Italia...
Old Italian had a system of wh pronouns with Case distinctions, which has been lost in modern Italia...
This paper investigates the use of demonstratives as relativizers from a new empirical and theoretic...
This paper investigates the use of distal demonstratives as relativizers in order to shed light on ...
This paper investigates the use of distal demonstratives as relativizers in order to shed light on ...
Following Kayne’s (2014) argumentation that the complementizer that is indeed a relative pronoun and...
In this programmatic work we intend to explore the possibility that the way we conceive complementa...
In this programmatic work we intend to explore the possibility that the way we conceive complementa...
This paper considers the syntax of relative clauses in Germanic and Romance languages within the fra...
Grammaticalization creates new grammatical exponents out of existing (lexical) ones. The standard as...
This paper considers the syntax of relative clauses in Germanic and Romance languages within the fra...
In this article I analyze the complementizer doubling construction attested in some early and modern...
This paper explores the syntactic status of che and (il) quale relativizers, i.e. what are standardl...
In this article we discuss evidence which suggests that the different uses of che in Modern and Old...
In this article we discuss evidence which suggests that the different uses of che in Modern and Old...
Old Italian had a system of wh pronouns with Case distinctions, which has been lost in modern Italia...
Old Italian had a system of wh pronouns with Case distinctions, which has been lost in modern Italia...
This paper investigates the use of demonstratives as relativizers from a new empirical and theoretic...
This paper investigates the use of distal demonstratives as relativizers in order to shed light on ...
This paper investigates the use of distal demonstratives as relativizers in order to shed light on ...
Following Kayne’s (2014) argumentation that the complementizer that is indeed a relative pronoun and...
In this programmatic work we intend to explore the possibility that the way we conceive complementa...
In this programmatic work we intend to explore the possibility that the way we conceive complementa...
This paper considers the syntax of relative clauses in Germanic and Romance languages within the fra...
Grammaticalization creates new grammatical exponents out of existing (lexical) ones. The standard as...
This paper considers the syntax of relative clauses in Germanic and Romance languages within the fra...
In this article I analyze the complementizer doubling construction attested in some early and modern...