Add to ORKGInternational audienceThe aim of this paper is to argue against a growing tendency to assimilate moral disagreements to disagreements about matters of personal taste. The argumentative strategy adopted in the paper appeals to a battery of linguistic criteria that reveal interesting and important differences between predicates of personal taste and moral predicates. The paper further argues that these semantically tractable differences have an impact on the nature of the corresponding disagreements
Disagreements about taste are often considered a problematic case for contextualism. The contextuali...
When speakers utter conflicting moral sentences, it seems clear that they disagree. It has often bee...
Moral disagreement — roughly, disagreement about what is right or wrong — is widely considered to be...
International audienceThe aim of this paper is to argue against a growing tendency to assimilate mor...
AbstractWhy would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relativ...
Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to tas...
In philosophy, there is much discussion about whether disagreements about taste, such as whether a c...
In the debate between contextualism and relativism about predicates of taste, the challenge from dis...
A number of proposals have been recently made that converge towards the idea that the truth value of...
Predicates of taste, such as ‘fun’ and ‘tasty’, have received considerable attention in recent debat...
Predicates of taste, such as ‘fun ’ and ‘tasty’, have received considerable attention in recent deba...
This paper argues for contextualism about predicates of personal taste and evaluative predicates in ...
In my dissertation, I explore the role of taste disagreements in the debate about the semantics of p...
This paper argues for contextualism about predicates of personal taste and evaluative predicates in ...
We frequently find ourselves in intractable disagreements about the morality of abortion euthanasia,...
Disagreements about taste are often considered a problematic case for contextualism. The contextuali...
When speakers utter conflicting moral sentences, it seems clear that they disagree. It has often bee...
Moral disagreement — roughly, disagreement about what is right or wrong — is widely considered to be...
International audienceThe aim of this paper is to argue against a growing tendency to assimilate mor...
AbstractWhy would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relativ...
Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to tas...
In philosophy, there is much discussion about whether disagreements about taste, such as whether a c...
In the debate between contextualism and relativism about predicates of taste, the challenge from dis...
A number of proposals have been recently made that converge towards the idea that the truth value of...
Predicates of taste, such as ‘fun’ and ‘tasty’, have received considerable attention in recent debat...
Predicates of taste, such as ‘fun ’ and ‘tasty’, have received considerable attention in recent deba...
This paper argues for contextualism about predicates of personal taste and evaluative predicates in ...
In my dissertation, I explore the role of taste disagreements in the debate about the semantics of p...
This paper argues for contextualism about predicates of personal taste and evaluative predicates in ...
We frequently find ourselves in intractable disagreements about the morality of abortion euthanasia,...
Disagreements about taste are often considered a problematic case for contextualism. The contextuali...
When speakers utter conflicting moral sentences, it seems clear that they disagree. It has often bee...
Moral disagreement — roughly, disagreement about what is right or wrong — is widely considered to be...