This paper examines how the different goals of terrorist group leaders affect their decision making calculus. This study uses a formal model and shows that terrorist group leaders who are more concerned with gaining concessions from the government are likely to use lower levels of violence. The empirical analysis echoes the results of the formal model and provides evidence for the external validity of the model. Taken together these results suggest that some of the variation in terrorist group lethality is due to variation in the terrorist group leaders\u27 goals
The effects of terrorist organization leadership decapitation on organizations’ demands and behavior...
The strategy of leadership decapitation continues to remain a contentious portion of counterterroris...
We identify robust statistical patterns in the frequency and severity of violent attacks by terroris...
Targeted killings have become a central component of counter-terrorism strategy. In response to the ...
How do terrorist groups control their members? Do the tools groups use to monitor their operatives a...
Terrorism has long plagued the global community in its goal of achieving sustained peace and securit...
Terrorism presents a fundamental paradox - groups that use terrorism are vastly weaker in terms of t...
This study explored the psychological dynamics of terrorism based on a structured comparison of the ...
Paper presented at the International Studies Association Conference March, 26 2008While many people ...
Existing research on terrorism as a strategy has largely neglected the apparent differences in what ...
Leadership decapitation -- the practice of removing a leader from a position of authority through ta...
Doctor of PhilosophySecurity Studies Interdepartmental ProgramAndrew G. LongDavid R. StoneThis disse...
This article contributes to the literature on terrorist group decision-making by introducing a new p...
Many governments maintain lists of terrorist groups, imposing sanctions on designated organizations....
This paper examines when non-state actors engaging in low levels of political violence (terrorism) a...
The effects of terrorist organization leadership decapitation on organizations’ demands and behavior...
The strategy of leadership decapitation continues to remain a contentious portion of counterterroris...
We identify robust statistical patterns in the frequency and severity of violent attacks by terroris...
Targeted killings have become a central component of counter-terrorism strategy. In response to the ...
How do terrorist groups control their members? Do the tools groups use to monitor their operatives a...
Terrorism has long plagued the global community in its goal of achieving sustained peace and securit...
Terrorism presents a fundamental paradox - groups that use terrorism are vastly weaker in terms of t...
This study explored the psychological dynamics of terrorism based on a structured comparison of the ...
Paper presented at the International Studies Association Conference March, 26 2008While many people ...
Existing research on terrorism as a strategy has largely neglected the apparent differences in what ...
Leadership decapitation -- the practice of removing a leader from a position of authority through ta...
Doctor of PhilosophySecurity Studies Interdepartmental ProgramAndrew G. LongDavid R. StoneThis disse...
This article contributes to the literature on terrorist group decision-making by introducing a new p...
Many governments maintain lists of terrorist groups, imposing sanctions on designated organizations....
This paper examines when non-state actors engaging in low levels of political violence (terrorism) a...
The effects of terrorist organization leadership decapitation on organizations’ demands and behavior...
The strategy of leadership decapitation continues to remain a contentious portion of counterterroris...
We identify robust statistical patterns in the frequency and severity of violent attacks by terroris...