Feasibility of bacterial probiotics for mitigating coral bleaching

© 2020 Ashley M DunganGiven the increasing frequency of climate change driven coral mass bleaching and mass mortality events, intervention strategies aimed at enhancing coral thermal tolerance (assisted evolution) are urgently needed in addition to strong action to reduce carbon emissions. Without such interventions, coral reefs will not survive. The seven chapters in my thesis explore the feasibility of using a host-sourced bacterial probiotic to mitigate bleaching starting with a history of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as a biological explanation for bleaching (Chapter 1). In part because of the difficulty to experimentally manipulate corals post-bleaching, I use Great Barrier Reef (GBR)-sourced Exaiptasia diaphana as a model organism for this system, which I describe in Chapter 2. The comparatively high levels of physiological and genetic variability among GBR anemone genotypes make these animals representatives of global E. diaphana diversity and thus excellent model organisms. The ‘oxidative stress theory for coral bleaching’ provides rationale for the development of a probiotic with a high free radical scavenging ability. In Chapter 3, I construct a probiotic comprised of E. diaphana-associated bacteria able to reduce oxidative stress by neutralizing free radicals such as ROS. I identified six strains with high free radical scavenging ability belonging to the families Alteromonadaceae, Rhodobacteraceae, Flavobacteriaceae, and Micrococcaceae. In parallel, I established a “negative” probiotic consisting of closely related strains with poor free radical scavenging capacities. The application of this probiotic to mitigate the negative impacts of exposure to a simulated heat wave was tested in Chapter 4. There was no evidence for improved thermal tolerance in E. diaphana. Changes in the relative abundance of anemone-sourced Labrenzia provided evidence for its integration in the E. diaphana microbiome. Uptake of other probiotic members was inconsistent and probiotic members did not persist in the anemone microbiome over time. Consequently, the failure of the probiotic inoculation to confer improved thermal tolerance may have been due to the absence of probiotic bacteria for the full duration of the experiment. Importantly, there were no apparent physiological impacts on the holobiont following inoculation, thus showing that shifting the abundance of native anemone microbiome members was not detrimental to holobiont health. Further, I found no evidence for an increase in ROS in the E. diaphana holobiont when it was exposed to heat. Some of the most compelling evidence in support of the ‘oxidative stress theory of coral bleaching’ comes from three published studies that expose corals, cultures of their algal endosymbiont, or E. diaphana to exogenous antioxidants during thermal stress. To confirm that ROS is the main driver behind thermal bleaching in E. diaphana, I replicated these previous experiments with novel methods that allowed a more accurate quantitation of ROS, and found that dosing with exogenous antioxidants (mannitol and ascorbate plus catalase) mitigates bleaching in E. diaphana, with no correlation between bleaching and increased ROS (Chapter 5). A serendipitous finding was that the E. diaphana bacterial community diversity can be rapidly reduced when anemones are reared in sterile seawater, making this model suitable for testing the efficacy of microbial restructuring strategies (Chapter 6). Taken together, the work from my PhD has shown that ROS scavenging varies among anemone-associated bacteria and that a high ROS-scavenging probiotic can be developed. Further, my findings have unveiled several main knowledge gaps that need to be filled before probiotics can be implemented, including administration strategies and choice of probiotic bacteria that maximise the maintenance of probiotic communities over time and a direct measurements of ROS in bleaching corals (Chapter 7)