Study design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: To determine risk factors associated with failure to reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) for spondylolisthesis. Summary of background data: The MCID of PROs are often utilized to determine the benefit of spinal procedures. However, negative predictive factors for reaching MCID in patients surgically treated for lumbar spondylolisthesis have been difficult to elucidate. Materials and methods: A prospectively maintained surgical database of patients who were diagnosed with lumbar spondylolisthesis and surgically treated with a single level MIS TLIF ...
Background context: interbody fusion is the gold standard in the treatment of lumbosacral spondyloli...
Study DesignProspective nonrandomized study.PurposeTo find a possible correlation between clinical o...
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim were to (1) evaluate differences in pos...
Study design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: To determine risk factors associated with failure to ...
Study design: A retrospective observational study. Objective: This study investigated the clinical ...
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized study. PURPOSE: To find a possible correlation between clini...
Study DesignRetrospective review of prospective registry data.PurposeTo determine 5-year clinical an...
STUDY DESIGN: The authors retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 231 patients with anterio...
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Purpose: Comparison between three different minimally inva...
BACKGROUND: It is well known that clinical improvements following surgical intervention are variable...
Study Design: Single-center retrospective study. Purpose: To compare the physical function and quali...
Objective: We aim to compare the rate of revisions for adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar s...
Study design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: To compare postoperative improvements in surgical and...
Study Design Retrospective cohort study (level of evidence: 4). Purpose To describe the potential co...
Study design: Retrospective study of 24 patients who underwent either a bilateral or unilateral TLIF...
Background context: interbody fusion is the gold standard in the treatment of lumbosacral spondyloli...
Study DesignProspective nonrandomized study.PurposeTo find a possible correlation between clinical o...
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim were to (1) evaluate differences in pos...
Study design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: To determine risk factors associated with failure to ...
Study design: A retrospective observational study. Objective: This study investigated the clinical ...
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized study. PURPOSE: To find a possible correlation between clini...
Study DesignRetrospective review of prospective registry data.PurposeTo determine 5-year clinical an...
STUDY DESIGN: The authors retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 231 patients with anterio...
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Purpose: Comparison between three different minimally inva...
BACKGROUND: It is well known that clinical improvements following surgical intervention are variable...
Study Design: Single-center retrospective study. Purpose: To compare the physical function and quali...
Objective: We aim to compare the rate of revisions for adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar s...
Study design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: To compare postoperative improvements in surgical and...
Study Design Retrospective cohort study (level of evidence: 4). Purpose To describe the potential co...
Study design: Retrospective study of 24 patients who underwent either a bilateral or unilateral TLIF...
Background context: interbody fusion is the gold standard in the treatment of lumbosacral spondyloli...
Study DesignProspective nonrandomized study.PurposeTo find a possible correlation between clinical o...
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim were to (1) evaluate differences in pos...