Translocation and proteolytic processing of nascent secretory polypeptide chains: two functions associated with the ribosomal domain of the endoplasmic reticulum.

Rat liver microsomes were subfractionated by isopycnic centrifugation in sucrose gradient. The subfractions were assayed for translocation and proteolytic processing of nascent polypeptides in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate programmed with total RNA from human term placenta. The distribution of the translocation and processing of prelactogen through the gradient correlated with that of the microsomal RNA (ribosomes). Microsomes became inactive upon incubation with elastase, but the proteolyzed membranes recovered their activity by recombination with the soluble and active fragment of the docking protein (SRP-receptor) from dog pancreas. When this fragment was combined with the gradient subfractions, or with the subfractions inactivated by incubation with elastase, the density profile of the translocation activity remained similar to that of RNA. Thus, its distribution cannot be accounted for merely by that of the docking protein; another membrane constituent, still unidentified, is both necessary for translocation of polypeptides and restricted to the rough portions of the endosplamic reticulum. Signal peptidase was assayed in the absence of protein synthesis, by use of preformed prelactogen and detergent-disrupted microsomes. Its density distribution was also similar to that of RNA. Several components of the endosplamic reticulum now appear to be segregated within restricted areas on either side of the membrane, and to make up a biochemically distinct domain. We propose to call it the ribosomal domain in consideration of its contribution to protein biosynthesis by bound ribosomes. This domain probably accounts for a greater part of the membrane area at the cytoplasmic than at the luminal surface, as postulated earlier to explain how enzymes of the cytoplasmic surface are relatively less abundant in the rough microsomes than those of the luminal surface [Amar-Costesec A. & Beaufay H. (1981) J. Theor. Biol. 89, 217-230]