Previous research has shown that people tend to infra-humanize outgroup members by being reluctant to attribute them secondary, uniquely human, emotions (Demoulin et al., 2004; Leyens et al., 2000). In the present paper, we extend the infra-humanization theory by arguing that people, going to the opposite pole of the humanness continuum, have also the tendency to supra-humanize some supernatural entities. Two exploratory studies focusing at the explicit perceptions of God and the self give support to these assumptions. The several consequences of gods' supra-humanization for social cognition are discussed
People typically evaluate their in-groups more favorably than out-groups and themselves more favorab...
This research tested the infra-humanization hypothesis that uniquely human emotions (e.g., love, sor...
The uniquely human content of stereotypes was measured in nine different inter-group comparisons tha...
Previous research has shown that people tend to infra–humanize outgroup members by being reluctant t...
Infra-humanizing outgroups involves considering outgroups less human and more animal-like than the i...
Groups are social constructions with differences. People spontaneously attempt to explain difference...
Both at a conceptual and an empirical level, infra-humanization has been put on par with the relativ...
People tend to infra-humanize by attributing more human essence to their in-group than to out-groups...
Studies on infra-humanization have confirmed a greater attribution of secondary emotions to the ingr...
Groups are social constructions with differences. People spontaneously attempt to explain difference...
Three studies investigated moderators of the tendency to attribute greater humanness to the self tha...
In explaining differences between groups, people ascribe the human essence to their ingroup and cons...
We review a programme of research on the attribution of humanness to people, and the ways in which l...
In explaining differences between groups, people ascribe the human essence to their ingroup and cons...
[Infra-humanization of outgroups throughout the world. The role of similarity, intergroup friendship...
People typically evaluate their in-groups more favorably than out-groups and themselves more favorab...
This research tested the infra-humanization hypothesis that uniquely human emotions (e.g., love, sor...
The uniquely human content of stereotypes was measured in nine different inter-group comparisons tha...
Previous research has shown that people tend to infra–humanize outgroup members by being reluctant t...
Infra-humanizing outgroups involves considering outgroups less human and more animal-like than the i...
Groups are social constructions with differences. People spontaneously attempt to explain difference...
Both at a conceptual and an empirical level, infra-humanization has been put on par with the relativ...
People tend to infra-humanize by attributing more human essence to their in-group than to out-groups...
Studies on infra-humanization have confirmed a greater attribution of secondary emotions to the ingr...
Groups are social constructions with differences. People spontaneously attempt to explain difference...
Three studies investigated moderators of the tendency to attribute greater humanness to the self tha...
In explaining differences between groups, people ascribe the human essence to their ingroup and cons...
We review a programme of research on the attribution of humanness to people, and the ways in which l...
In explaining differences between groups, people ascribe the human essence to their ingroup and cons...
[Infra-humanization of outgroups throughout the world. The role of similarity, intergroup friendship...
People typically evaluate their in-groups more favorably than out-groups and themselves more favorab...
This research tested the infra-humanization hypothesis that uniquely human emotions (e.g., love, sor...
The uniquely human content of stereotypes was measured in nine different inter-group comparisons tha...