Add to ORKGIn a study of gender bias in 145 journals in various areas of research, including 1.7 million authors and 740,00 referees, these authors show that in biomedicine and health journals women authors were treated generally favourably by editors and reviewers. This is in contrast to social science and humanity journals. The authors advocate for gender diversity among reviewers and editors to mitigate the perception and reality of bias
There is a widespread perception in the academic community that peer review is subject to many biase...
Peer review is the primary method by which journals evaluate the quality and importance of scientifi...
Background: The present study aims to elucidate the state of gender equality in high-quality researc...
In a study of gender bias in 145 journals in various areas of research, including 1.7 million author...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
The editorial materials in top medical and public health journals are opportunities for ...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
Background and objective: There is persistent men-dominated gender disparity in medical academia. Pr...
Before we introduce the articles collected in this issue, we want to reflect on practices and public...
Despite women earning similar numbers of graduate degrees as men in STEM disciplines, they are under...
Lack of diversity on editorial boards might generate disparities in editorial and peer review that c...
Despite women earning similar numbers of graduate degrees as men in STEM disciplines, they are under...
COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) is a non-statutory body which aims to provide practical publi...
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the field of medical education has sought to amplify the voices of thos...
There is a widespread perception in the academic community that peer review is subject to many biase...
Peer review is the primary method by which journals evaluate the quality and importance of scientifi...
Background: The present study aims to elucidate the state of gender equality in high-quality researc...
In a study of gender bias in 145 journals in various areas of research, including 1.7 million author...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
The editorial materials in top medical and public health journals are opportunities for ...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
Background and objective: There is persistent men-dominated gender disparity in medical academia. Pr...
Before we introduce the articles collected in this issue, we want to reflect on practices and public...
Despite women earning similar numbers of graduate degrees as men in STEM disciplines, they are under...
Lack of diversity on editorial boards might generate disparities in editorial and peer review that c...
Despite women earning similar numbers of graduate degrees as men in STEM disciplines, they are under...
COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) is a non-statutory body which aims to provide practical publi...
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the field of medical education has sought to amplify the voices of thos...
There is a widespread perception in the academic community that peer review is subject to many biase...
Peer review is the primary method by which journals evaluate the quality and importance of scientifi...
Background: The present study aims to elucidate the state of gender equality in high-quality researc...