This paper tackles the methodological question of how coherence relations and their surface cues, e.g. causal connectives, may be categorised into different discourse domains. In this context, the central issue is the need for explicit and objective criteria that can be applied by different analysts to all kinds of natural texts. Strengths and weaknesses of different methods that are currently used in corpus studies are passed in review
Abstract: in this paper we experimentally address the issue of the constraints governing the use of ...
Causality and subjectivity are relevant cognitive principles in the categorization of coherence rela...
Causality and subjectivity are relevant cognitive principles in the categorization of coherence rela...
Connectives and the coherence relations they express are among the build-ing blocks of discourse. It...
To fully understand a discourse, it is essential not only to know the meaning of each individual cla...
To fully understand a discourse, it is essential not only to know the meaning of each individual cla...
To fully understand a discourse, it is essential not only to know the meaning of each individual cla...
A discourse is not merely a collection of random utterances. Rather, the components of a discourse a...
This corpus-based study investigates the inter-relation between discourse markers (DMs) and other co...
Coherence relations have proved a useful tool in recent computational models of discourse. However, ...
The notion that a text is coherent in virtue of the `relations' that hold between its component...
Coherence relations and their linguistic markers play a significant role in the study of discourse p...
This study focused on the cognitive representation of causal coherence relations linguistically mark...
coherence relations This paper describes a three-stage methodology for investigating the semantics a...
Institute for Communicating and Collaborative SystemsThe notion that a text is coherent in virtue of...
Abstract: in this paper we experimentally address the issue of the constraints governing the use of ...
Causality and subjectivity are relevant cognitive principles in the categorization of coherence rela...
Causality and subjectivity are relevant cognitive principles in the categorization of coherence rela...
Connectives and the coherence relations they express are among the build-ing blocks of discourse. It...
To fully understand a discourse, it is essential not only to know the meaning of each individual cla...
To fully understand a discourse, it is essential not only to know the meaning of each individual cla...
To fully understand a discourse, it is essential not only to know the meaning of each individual cla...
A discourse is not merely a collection of random utterances. Rather, the components of a discourse a...
This corpus-based study investigates the inter-relation between discourse markers (DMs) and other co...
Coherence relations have proved a useful tool in recent computational models of discourse. However, ...
The notion that a text is coherent in virtue of the `relations' that hold between its component...
Coherence relations and their linguistic markers play a significant role in the study of discourse p...
This study focused on the cognitive representation of causal coherence relations linguistically mark...
coherence relations This paper describes a three-stage methodology for investigating the semantics a...
Institute for Communicating and Collaborative SystemsThe notion that a text is coherent in virtue of...
Abstract: in this paper we experimentally address the issue of the constraints governing the use of ...
Causality and subjectivity are relevant cognitive principles in the categorization of coherence rela...
Causality and subjectivity are relevant cognitive principles in the categorization of coherence rela...