We provide an alternative explanation for the previous finding of analysts' overreaction to extreme good news in earnings. We show that such finding could be a result of analysts' rational behavior in the face of high earnings uncertainty rather than their cognitive bias. Extreme earnings performance tends to be associated with higher earnings uncertainty that generally leads to more forecast optimism. Once this effect is accounted for, the univariate result of analysts' overreaction to extreme good news in earnings is subsumed, leaving only their underreaction in general. © 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
This paper examines the information contained in analyst forecast revisions following earnings annou...
Overconfident CEOs are known to overestimate their ability to generate returns, overpay for target fir...
This study presents evidence suggesting that investors do not fully unravel predictable pessimism in...
Abstract: We show that the previous finding of analysts ’ overreaction to extreme good news in earni...
Preannouncements of earnings tend to overstate negative or understate positive news, which decreases...
Prior research attributes zero and small positive earnings surprises to managers’ incentives for ear...
Prior archival studies of analysts ’ forecasts have found evidence for systematic underreaction, sys...
We present a two-stage model for the decision making process of financial analysts when issuing earn...
We examine hypotheses derived from behavioral decision theory regarding conditions that lead to over...
We present a two-stage model for the decision making process of financial analysts when issuing earn...
This paper provides evidence that analysts who have predicted earnings more accurately than the medi...
This paper examines analysts’ forecast behavior in a setting in which CEOs are optimistic and analy...
The purpose of the study is to examine reasons behind analysts` EPS –forecast optimism in the Finnis...
International audienceThis paper provides evidence that analysts who have predicted earnings more ac...
This study empirically investigates how a firm’s earnings uncertainty affects analysts’ herding beha...
This paper examines the information contained in analyst forecast revisions following earnings annou...
Overconfident CEOs are known to overestimate their ability to generate returns, overpay for target fir...
This study presents evidence suggesting that investors do not fully unravel predictable pessimism in...
Abstract: We show that the previous finding of analysts ’ overreaction to extreme good news in earni...
Preannouncements of earnings tend to overstate negative or understate positive news, which decreases...
Prior research attributes zero and small positive earnings surprises to managers’ incentives for ear...
Prior archival studies of analysts ’ forecasts have found evidence for systematic underreaction, sys...
We present a two-stage model for the decision making process of financial analysts when issuing earn...
We examine hypotheses derived from behavioral decision theory regarding conditions that lead to over...
We present a two-stage model for the decision making process of financial analysts when issuing earn...
This paper provides evidence that analysts who have predicted earnings more accurately than the medi...
This paper examines analysts’ forecast behavior in a setting in which CEOs are optimistic and analy...
The purpose of the study is to examine reasons behind analysts` EPS –forecast optimism in the Finnis...
International audienceThis paper provides evidence that analysts who have predicted earnings more ac...
This study empirically investigates how a firm’s earnings uncertainty affects analysts’ herding beha...
This paper examines the information contained in analyst forecast revisions following earnings annou...
Overconfident CEOs are known to overestimate their ability to generate returns, overpay for target fir...
This study presents evidence suggesting that investors do not fully unravel predictable pessimism in...