Metrics of Scientific Journalism - Truths, Myths and Misconceptions

Evolucija digitalnog doba dovela je do razvoja tzv. indeksnih publikacija u današnje online baze podataka. U radu su ukratko prikazane četiri najpopularnije baze podataka u Hrvatskoj: Current Contents, Web of Science, Scopus i Google Scholar, s kratkom poviješću, pokrivenošću (uključeni hrvatski naslovi), značajkama i mogućnostima citatnih analiza. Diskutirane su njihove dobre i loše strane, kao i važnost učinkovitog korištenja i odgovarajuće interpretacije podataka. Čimbenik utjecaja i drugi bibliometrijski parametri često se pogrešno koriste pri prosudbi utjecaja individualnog rada ili autora. Ovaj rad može pomoći svima onima koji donose pravila i propise, bibliotekarima, administraciji i znanstvenicima, kako bi pažljivije i mudrije koristili podatke dobivene iz različitih baza podataka koristili pri prosudbi znanstvenih istraživanja.The evolution of the digital age has led to the development of so-called abstracting/indexing printed publications in online databases. A short survey of the four most popular databases in Croatia has been done, as Current Contents, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar, with short history, coverage (included Croatian titles), features and possibilities of citation analysis. We discuss their strengths and weaknesses, and the importance of the efficient usage and appropriate interpretation of the data. The journal impact factor and other bibliometric measures are frequently misused to estimate the influence of individual papers and authors. Explaining potential benefits and limitations of bibliometric indicators, this article may help policymakers, librarians, administrators, and individual researchers to use the data provided by different databases more carefully and wisely in the evaluation of research