The jurisdiction or competence of the Equality Court to hear a dispute concerning alleged hate speech is affected by various jurisdictional factors. The decision in South African Human Rights Commission v Khumalo 2019 1 All SA 254 (GJ) reveals several shortcomings in the provisions regulating jurisdiction in the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 which must be attended to in order to provide clarity and legitimacy in regard to the application of the protection against hate speech
The factual matrix that is considered in each hate speech case differs from that in the next. Howev...
This article responds to some of the issues raised by Marais and Pretorius in their 2015 article tit...
This paper looks at the tools available on an international and European level in relation to the le...
The jurisdiction or competence of the Equality Court to hear a dispute concerning alleged hate speec...
Protecting people against hate speech and racist slurs requires weighing up several fundamental righ...
This contribution examines the judgment of the Equality Court in SAHRC obo South African Jewish Boar...
In November 2019 the Supreme Court of Appeal in Qwelane v South African Human Rights Commission rule...
Hate speech in South Africa creates a tension between the right to freedom of expression and the rig...
In its judgment in Qwelane v South African Human Rights Commission 2022 2 BCLR 129 (CC), the Constit...
The cases of ANC v Penny Sparrow and State v Penny Sparrow, respectively in the Equality Court and t...
Racism has informed South African society since colonial times. Racist beliefs found expression in t...
The factual matrix that is considered in each hate speech case differs from that in the next. Howeve...
In recent years, “Shoot the Boer” (“Dubul’ ibhunu”), a well-known protest song from the apartheid er...
The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 (PEPUDA) prohibits i...
Considering the infringements upon the principle of equality caused by hate crimes, as well as the n...
The factual matrix that is considered in each hate speech case differs from that in the next. Howev...
This article responds to some of the issues raised by Marais and Pretorius in their 2015 article tit...
This paper looks at the tools available on an international and European level in relation to the le...
The jurisdiction or competence of the Equality Court to hear a dispute concerning alleged hate speec...
Protecting people against hate speech and racist slurs requires weighing up several fundamental righ...
This contribution examines the judgment of the Equality Court in SAHRC obo South African Jewish Boar...
In November 2019 the Supreme Court of Appeal in Qwelane v South African Human Rights Commission rule...
Hate speech in South Africa creates a tension between the right to freedom of expression and the rig...
In its judgment in Qwelane v South African Human Rights Commission 2022 2 BCLR 129 (CC), the Constit...
The cases of ANC v Penny Sparrow and State v Penny Sparrow, respectively in the Equality Court and t...
Racism has informed South African society since colonial times. Racist beliefs found expression in t...
The factual matrix that is considered in each hate speech case differs from that in the next. Howeve...
In recent years, “Shoot the Boer” (“Dubul’ ibhunu”), a well-known protest song from the apartheid er...
The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 (PEPUDA) prohibits i...
Considering the infringements upon the principle of equality caused by hate crimes, as well as the n...
The factual matrix that is considered in each hate speech case differs from that in the next. Howev...
This article responds to some of the issues raised by Marais and Pretorius in their 2015 article tit...
This paper looks at the tools available on an international and European level in relation to the le...