The full and final version of this article is available in the published book.This is an judgment in a book of feminist judgments. It is an alternative judgment, written from a feminist perspective, of a leading decision setting out the approach to be adopted in cases of disputed child contact in cases involving allegations of domestic violence. It aims to provide a challenge to the reasoning of the judges in that case and to demonstrate that a different perspective could have led to different reasoning that would have better protected the interests of women and children
This research examined Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) reports prep...
This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Current Le...
The Feminist Judgment Projects are collaborations of hundreds of feminist jurists who reimagine and ...
Despite the prevalence of domestic violence in private law Children Act proceedings, courts rarely r...
Fact-finding hearings may be held to determine disputed allegations of domestic violence in child co...
Book synopsis: While feminist legal scholarship has thrived within universities and in some sectors ...
An imagined judgment delivered in the contact case of White v White, structured according to feminis...
From book synopsis: While feminist legal scholarship has thrived within universities and in some se...
Purpose: This thesis explores women’s experiences of the child contact process where intimate partne...
One of the enduring problems identifi ed by feminist legal scholars is the difficulty of implementin...
peer-reviewedThis study examined judges’ constructions of the ‘best interests of the child’ in child...
Many new laws and policies are emerging in the area of domestic violence. In 1994, the Legislature p...
A symposium in which the conference speakers give a clear and disturbing picture of how we ascribe a...
Second wave feminists in Australia brought the social issue of domestic violence out of the suburban...
This Commentary accompanies the "feminist judgment" on the so-called "Kerry Babies case" in "Norther...
This research examined Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) reports prep...
This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Current Le...
The Feminist Judgment Projects are collaborations of hundreds of feminist jurists who reimagine and ...
Despite the prevalence of domestic violence in private law Children Act proceedings, courts rarely r...
Fact-finding hearings may be held to determine disputed allegations of domestic violence in child co...
Book synopsis: While feminist legal scholarship has thrived within universities and in some sectors ...
An imagined judgment delivered in the contact case of White v White, structured according to feminis...
From book synopsis: While feminist legal scholarship has thrived within universities and in some se...
Purpose: This thesis explores women’s experiences of the child contact process where intimate partne...
One of the enduring problems identifi ed by feminist legal scholars is the difficulty of implementin...
peer-reviewedThis study examined judges’ constructions of the ‘best interests of the child’ in child...
Many new laws and policies are emerging in the area of domestic violence. In 1994, the Legislature p...
A symposium in which the conference speakers give a clear and disturbing picture of how we ascribe a...
Second wave feminists in Australia brought the social issue of domestic violence out of the suburban...
This Commentary accompanies the "feminist judgment" on the so-called "Kerry Babies case" in "Norther...
This research examined Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) reports prep...
This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Current Le...
The Feminist Judgment Projects are collaborations of hundreds of feminist jurists who reimagine and ...