Add to ORKGLogicians and philosophers of science have proposed various formal criteria for theoretical equivalence. In this paper, we examine two such proposals: definitional equivalence and categorical equivalence. In order to show precisely how these two well-known criteria are related to one another, we investigate an intermediate criterion called Morita equivalence
This paper aims to provide a new criterion of formal equivalence of theories that is suitable for be...
Glymour (1970, 1977, 1980) and Quine (1975) propose two different formal criteria for theoretical eq...
Glymour (1970, 1977, 1980) and Quine (1975) propose two different formal criteria for theoretical eq...
Logicians and philosophers of science have proposed various formal criteria for theoretical equivale...
Logicians and philosophers of science have proposed various formal criteria for theoretical equivale...
In recent years philosophers of science have explored categorical equivalence as a promising criteri...
In recent years philosophers of science have explored categorical equivalence as a promising criteri...
In recent years philosophers of science have explored categorical equivalence as a promising criteri...
In recent years philosophers of science have explored categorical equivalence as a promising criteri...
This article proposes to explicate theoretical equivalence by supplementing formal equivalence crite...
This article proposes to explicate theoretical equivalence by supplementing formal equivalence crite...
This article proposes to explicate theoretical equivalence by supplementing formal equivalence crite...
This article proposes to explicate theoretical equivalence by supplementing formal equivalence crite...
This article proposes to explicate theoretical equivalence by supplementing formal equivalence crite...
This paper aims to provide a new criterion of formal equivalence of theories that is suitable for be...
This paper aims to provide a new criterion of formal equivalence of theories that is suitable for be...
Glymour (1970, 1977, 1980) and Quine (1975) propose two different formal criteria for theoretical eq...
Glymour (1970, 1977, 1980) and Quine (1975) propose two different formal criteria for theoretical eq...
Logicians and philosophers of science have proposed various formal criteria for theoretical equivale...
Logicians and philosophers of science have proposed various formal criteria for theoretical equivale...
In recent years philosophers of science have explored categorical equivalence as a promising criteri...
In recent years philosophers of science have explored categorical equivalence as a promising criteri...
In recent years philosophers of science have explored categorical equivalence as a promising criteri...
In recent years philosophers of science have explored categorical equivalence as a promising criteri...
This article proposes to explicate theoretical equivalence by supplementing formal equivalence crite...
This article proposes to explicate theoretical equivalence by supplementing formal equivalence crite...
This article proposes to explicate theoretical equivalence by supplementing formal equivalence crite...
This article proposes to explicate theoretical equivalence by supplementing formal equivalence crite...
This article proposes to explicate theoretical equivalence by supplementing formal equivalence crite...
This paper aims to provide a new criterion of formal equivalence of theories that is suitable for be...
This paper aims to provide a new criterion of formal equivalence of theories that is suitable for be...
Glymour (1970, 1977, 1980) and Quine (1975) propose two different formal criteria for theoretical eq...
Glymour (1970, 1977, 1980) and Quine (1975) propose two different formal criteria for theoretical eq...