Add to ORKGThis paper explores, in the light of recent empirical results from neurobiology, some issues having to do with the contrast between “emotion” and “cognition” and the ways in which these figure in moral judgment and decision-making. The role of reward learning in emotional processing and the implications of this for "rationalist" moral theories is emphasized
Adecade’s researchhighlights a critical dissociationbetweenautomatic andcontrolled influencesonmoral...
Neuroimaging studies on moral decision-making have thus far largely focused on differences between m...
The dual process theory posits that people relies on their emotion (especially negative emotions) w...
This paper explores, in the light of recent empirical results from neurobiology, some issues having...
I draw on neurobiological evidence to defend the rationalist thesis that moral judgments are essenti...
An ancient tradition that conceives of reason and emotion as opposed still underlies some strands of...
Decision making is traditionally viewed as a rational process where reason calculates the best way t...
Findings in the field of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience have shed new light on o...
AbstractTraditional theories of moral psychology emphasize reasoning and “higher cognition,” while m...
A central aim of current research in moral decision making is to propose a mechanism to explain how ...
I argue that our best science supports the rationalist idea that, independent of reasoning, emotions...
The dual-track theory of moral reasoning has received considerable attention due to the neuroimaging...
Humans are a social species. Automatic affective responses generated by neural systems wired into ou...
ABSTRACT This article reviews recent advances in the cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment and be...
Morality is a multidimensional phenomenon that includes cognitive and affective processes and affect...
Adecade’s researchhighlights a critical dissociationbetweenautomatic andcontrolled influencesonmoral...
Neuroimaging studies on moral decision-making have thus far largely focused on differences between m...
The dual process theory posits that people relies on their emotion (especially negative emotions) w...
This paper explores, in the light of recent empirical results from neurobiology, some issues having...
I draw on neurobiological evidence to defend the rationalist thesis that moral judgments are essenti...
An ancient tradition that conceives of reason and emotion as opposed still underlies some strands of...
Decision making is traditionally viewed as a rational process where reason calculates the best way t...
Findings in the field of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience have shed new light on o...
AbstractTraditional theories of moral psychology emphasize reasoning and “higher cognition,” while m...
A central aim of current research in moral decision making is to propose a mechanism to explain how ...
I argue that our best science supports the rationalist idea that, independent of reasoning, emotions...
The dual-track theory of moral reasoning has received considerable attention due to the neuroimaging...
Humans are a social species. Automatic affective responses generated by neural systems wired into ou...
ABSTRACT This article reviews recent advances in the cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment and be...
Morality is a multidimensional phenomenon that includes cognitive and affective processes and affect...
Adecade’s researchhighlights a critical dissociationbetweenautomatic andcontrolled influencesonmoral...
Neuroimaging studies on moral decision-making have thus far largely focused on differences between m...
The dual process theory posits that people relies on their emotion (especially negative emotions) w...