Two recent decisions of the High Court dealing with the liability of local councils in negligence for injuries caused when members of the public dive into the sea are considered. While the plaintiffs concerned failed in their claims, the decisions helpfully clarify questions as to whether the ‘duty of care’ analysis should be generalised or more specific, and the relevance of the ‘obviousness’ of a risk to both duty and breach questions. They incidentally also point to the need for better compensation arrangements in Australia for severely injured persons
INTRODUCTION: An individual case review of diving-related deaths reported as occurring in Australia ...
The topic of this thesis relates to the negligent infliction of economic loss. In particular, it is ...
This article reports and analyses the results of a study of High Court negligence decisions from 200...
In the recent New South Wales Supreme Court decision in Laoulach v El Khoury (El Khoury’s Case), the...
The Australian High Court ruling on the Graham Barclays Oysters case, where oysters unfit for human ...
Comments on the Queen's Bench Division decision in Tolley v Carr on whether an individual who rescue...
The availability of compensation for loss of chance in clinical negligence cases appeared to be avai...
If a tourist is accidentally injured while visiting Western Australia, he or she may seek damages in...
This Note asserts that courts should continue to apply the traditional maritime rescue doctrine alon...
Establishing a duty of care is foundational to establishing liability in negligence. In the almost 1...
The Queensland Court of Appeal recently heard a case that raised the defence of volenti non fit inju...
Australia's Great Barrier Reef is one of the world's most popular scuba diving destinations. Unfortu...
Introduction: An individual case review of diving-related deaths, reported as occurring in Australia...
The New South Wales Supreme Court has examined the statutory and common law duties of the New South ...
This editorial on health and guardianship law provides an overview of the causation issues that prec...
INTRODUCTION: An individual case review of diving-related deaths reported as occurring in Australia ...
The topic of this thesis relates to the negligent infliction of economic loss. In particular, it is ...
This article reports and analyses the results of a study of High Court negligence decisions from 200...
In the recent New South Wales Supreme Court decision in Laoulach v El Khoury (El Khoury’s Case), the...
The Australian High Court ruling on the Graham Barclays Oysters case, where oysters unfit for human ...
Comments on the Queen's Bench Division decision in Tolley v Carr on whether an individual who rescue...
The availability of compensation for loss of chance in clinical negligence cases appeared to be avai...
If a tourist is accidentally injured while visiting Western Australia, he or she may seek damages in...
This Note asserts that courts should continue to apply the traditional maritime rescue doctrine alon...
Establishing a duty of care is foundational to establishing liability in negligence. In the almost 1...
The Queensland Court of Appeal recently heard a case that raised the defence of volenti non fit inju...
Australia's Great Barrier Reef is one of the world's most popular scuba diving destinations. Unfortu...
Introduction: An individual case review of diving-related deaths, reported as occurring in Australia...
The New South Wales Supreme Court has examined the statutory and common law duties of the New South ...
This editorial on health and guardianship law provides an overview of the causation issues that prec...
INTRODUCTION: An individual case review of diving-related deaths reported as occurring in Australia ...
The topic of this thesis relates to the negligent infliction of economic loss. In particular, it is ...
This article reports and analyses the results of a study of High Court negligence decisions from 200...