Cultural religiosity has received little attention in psychology. This is an oversight, as cultural religiosity is an impactful cross-cultural dimension. We proceed to demonstrate that cultural religiosity shapes human psychology through three paths. First, cultural religiosity influences personal religiosity, which has many personal consequences. Second, cultural religiosity engenders personal consequences, independent of personal religiosity. Finally, cultural religiosity qualifies many of the effects of personal religiosity on personal consequences. The three paths are not unique to cultural religiosity; equivalent paths exist for virtually all cross-cultural dimensions. Yet, the three paths are particularly impactful in the domain of cu...
Religiosity is a concept used to describe numerous aspects of religious beliefs and doctrine. The ai...
Are religious people psychologically better or worse adjusted than their non-religious counterparts?...
After a brief introduction to psychology of religion as a scientific discipline, this article review...
Current psychological research into religiosity can be located into two paradigms: the cross-cultura...
In introducing this Special Issue we first consider six ways of thinking about how culture and relig...
Several measures of religious practice and religious orientation (intrinsic/extrinsic/quest) and two...
After reminding some of the historical relationships between psychology and religion, this chapter e...
Are there trans-religious, trans-cultural constants in psychological aspects of religion across diff...
Psychologists interested in culture have focused primarily on East–West differences in individualism...
When approaching religion from a cross-cultural psychological perspective, one faces questions regar...
There is a tendency to think of psychological processes as being universal with definite rules that ...
This article argues that religion should be fully integrated into cross-cultural research for four r...
Dimension of religiosity: A psychological viewpoint ...
Many of the first founders and political leaders of many countries were concerned with religious iss...
Abstract. Although psychology has taken an interdisciplinary approach to religion, at present most s...
Religiosity is a concept used to describe numerous aspects of religious beliefs and doctrine. The ai...
Are religious people psychologically better or worse adjusted than their non-religious counterparts?...
After a brief introduction to psychology of religion as a scientific discipline, this article review...
Current psychological research into religiosity can be located into two paradigms: the cross-cultura...
In introducing this Special Issue we first consider six ways of thinking about how culture and relig...
Several measures of religious practice and religious orientation (intrinsic/extrinsic/quest) and two...
After reminding some of the historical relationships between psychology and religion, this chapter e...
Are there trans-religious, trans-cultural constants in psychological aspects of religion across diff...
Psychologists interested in culture have focused primarily on East–West differences in individualism...
When approaching religion from a cross-cultural psychological perspective, one faces questions regar...
There is a tendency to think of psychological processes as being universal with definite rules that ...
This article argues that religion should be fully integrated into cross-cultural research for four r...
Dimension of religiosity: A psychological viewpoint ...
Many of the first founders and political leaders of many countries were concerned with religious iss...
Abstract. Although psychology has taken an interdisciplinary approach to religion, at present most s...
Religiosity is a concept used to describe numerous aspects of religious beliefs and doctrine. The ai...
Are religious people psychologically better or worse adjusted than their non-religious counterparts?...
After a brief introduction to psychology of religion as a scientific discipline, this article review...