We study the impact of research collaborations in coauthorship networks on total research output. Through the links in the collaboration network researchers create spillovers not only to their direct coauthors but also to researchers indirectly linked to them. We characterize the interior equilibrium when multiple agents spend effort in multiple, possibly overlapping projects, and there are interaction effects in the cost of effort
Science is increasingly produced in collaborative teams, but collaborative teams in science are self...
This research seeks an answer to the following question: what is the relationship between the struct...
Part 18: Benefits AnalysisInternational audienceIn this study, we analyze firms’ membership in R&D (...
We study the impact of research collaborations in coauthorship networks on total research output. Th...
This paper studies the impact of collaboration on research output. First, we build a micro-founded m...
Scientific collaboration is one of the key factors to trigger innovations. Coauthorship networks hav...
The analysis of co-authorship network aims at exploring the impact of network structure on the outco...
<p>A: the empirical collaboration network among researchers who published experimental papers in 199...
Using a database of all published articles in economic journals over the last 30 years, we investiga...
Empirical work suggests that the network of research and development alliances is asymmetric, with a...
This paper uses panel data on 339 economists to evaluate the relationship between coauthorship and o...
Science is increasingly produced in collaborative teams, but collaborative teams in science are self...
There is substantial competition among academic institutions. They compete for students, researchers...
Abstract. In this study, we analyze firms ’ membership in R&D (Research and Development) coopera...
Collaborations are pervasive in current science. Collaborations have been studied and encouraged in ...
Science is increasingly produced in collaborative teams, but collaborative teams in science are self...
This research seeks an answer to the following question: what is the relationship between the struct...
Part 18: Benefits AnalysisInternational audienceIn this study, we analyze firms’ membership in R&D (...
We study the impact of research collaborations in coauthorship networks on total research output. Th...
This paper studies the impact of collaboration on research output. First, we build a micro-founded m...
Scientific collaboration is one of the key factors to trigger innovations. Coauthorship networks hav...
The analysis of co-authorship network aims at exploring the impact of network structure on the outco...
<p>A: the empirical collaboration network among researchers who published experimental papers in 199...
Using a database of all published articles in economic journals over the last 30 years, we investiga...
Empirical work suggests that the network of research and development alliances is asymmetric, with a...
This paper uses panel data on 339 economists to evaluate the relationship between coauthorship and o...
Science is increasingly produced in collaborative teams, but collaborative teams in science are self...
There is substantial competition among academic institutions. They compete for students, researchers...
Abstract. In this study, we analyze firms ’ membership in R&D (Research and Development) coopera...
Collaborations are pervasive in current science. Collaborations have been studied and encouraged in ...
Science is increasingly produced in collaborative teams, but collaborative teams in science are self...
This research seeks an answer to the following question: what is the relationship between the struct...
Part 18: Benefits AnalysisInternational audienceIn this study, we analyze firms’ membership in R&D (...