Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926) was an influential figure in the history of psychiatry as a clinical science. This paper, after briefly presenting his biography, discusses the conceptual foundations of his concept of mental illness and follows this line of thought through to late 20th-century "Neo-Kraepelinianism," including recent criticism, particularly of the nosological dichotomy of endogenous psychoses. Throughout his professional life, Kraepelin put emphasis on establishing psychiatry as a clinical science with a strong empirical background. He preferred pragmatic attitudes and arguments, thus underestimating the philosophical presuppositions of his work. As for nosology, his central hypothesis is the existence and scientific accessibility...
Throughout its development, psychiatry has struggled to legitimate itself as a scientific and medica...
Psychiatry is a young, still developing science, that must, against sharp opposition, gradually achi...
Kraepelin's basic attitude to the classification of psychoses was data-oriented and flexible. In his...
Emil Kraepelin (1856–1926) was an influential figure in the history of psychiatry as a clinical scie...
The fundamentals of Kraepelin's theory have been revisited by researchers known as "neokraepelians",...
In the last third of the 20th century, the German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926) became an ...
This paper reviews the importance Emil Kraepelin put on disease course as a classificatory principle...
The nosology for major psychiatric disorders developed by Emil Kraepelin in the 1890s has substantia...
Emil Kraepelin's contribution to the clinical and scientific field of psychiatry is recognized world...
In an article of 1920 entitled "Die Erscheinungsformen, des Irreseins," published in Kraepelin's pha...
Kraepelin's methodology and clinical descriptions are still influential in the XXIst century psychia...
Abstract Emil Kraepelin's nosology has been reinvented, for better or worse. In the United States, t...
In an article of 1920 entitled Die Erscheinungsformen des Irreseins, published in Kraepelin's phase ...
International audienceObjectives.–Adopting a historical perspective, this paper sets out to compare ...
Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926) is considered one of the founders of modern psychiatric nosology. However...
Throughout its development, psychiatry has struggled to legitimate itself as a scientific and medica...
Psychiatry is a young, still developing science, that must, against sharp opposition, gradually achi...
Kraepelin's basic attitude to the classification of psychoses was data-oriented and flexible. In his...
Emil Kraepelin (1856–1926) was an influential figure in the history of psychiatry as a clinical scie...
The fundamentals of Kraepelin's theory have been revisited by researchers known as "neokraepelians",...
In the last third of the 20th century, the German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926) became an ...
This paper reviews the importance Emil Kraepelin put on disease course as a classificatory principle...
The nosology for major psychiatric disorders developed by Emil Kraepelin in the 1890s has substantia...
Emil Kraepelin's contribution to the clinical and scientific field of psychiatry is recognized world...
In an article of 1920 entitled "Die Erscheinungsformen, des Irreseins," published in Kraepelin's pha...
Kraepelin's methodology and clinical descriptions are still influential in the XXIst century psychia...
Abstract Emil Kraepelin's nosology has been reinvented, for better or worse. In the United States, t...
In an article of 1920 entitled Die Erscheinungsformen des Irreseins, published in Kraepelin's phase ...
International audienceObjectives.–Adopting a historical perspective, this paper sets out to compare ...
Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926) is considered one of the founders of modern psychiatric nosology. However...
Throughout its development, psychiatry has struggled to legitimate itself as a scientific and medica...
Psychiatry is a young, still developing science, that must, against sharp opposition, gradually achi...
Kraepelin's basic attitude to the classification of psychoses was data-oriented and flexible. In his...