Last week saw the publication of an article entitled “The Subterranean War on Science” in the Association of Psychological Science’s Observer magazine. The authors – scientists from a range of disciplines – reflect on their experiences of their work becoming noticed in public. In particular, they argue that the harassment, bullying and abuse of scientists constitute a ‘war on science’ which should be publicised, with a view to “enable lawmakers to improve the balance between academic freedom and confidentiality of peer review on the one hand, and the public’s right to access information on the other”
This paper explores the phenomena of public scientific debates, where scientific controversies are a...
[Extract] Given the intensity of retributions against environmentalists globally, and the potential ...
Nosek and Bar-Anan suggest that psychologists should embrace digital communication in order to creat...
Last week saw the publication of an article entitled “The Subterranean War on Science” in the Associ...
Freedom of speech in academia can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it gives the liberty to expr...
I believe that tenured historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science—when presented with the...
The media have become an important arena where struggles over the symbolic legitimacy of expert auth...
Journalism and science are two vocational occupations with roots deep in the momentous developments ...
We discuss the current state of commodification of science and marginalization of individuals and gr...
A new “ethical” elite has arisen in science, the science watchdogs. In response to an inconsistent l...
International audienceAs STS scholars and historians of science have repeatedly shown, scientific kn...
Large-scale online science communication and engagement projects can assume an overly ordered and st...
Science is in crisis: a crisis of trust, and a crisis of values. Yet, this is an opportune moment fo...
Journal peer review performed in the natural sciences has been an object of study since at least 183...
ABSTRACT—Trafimow and Rice (2009; this issue) have written a thought-provoking article that addresse...
This paper explores the phenomena of public scientific debates, where scientific controversies are a...
[Extract] Given the intensity of retributions against environmentalists globally, and the potential ...
Nosek and Bar-Anan suggest that psychologists should embrace digital communication in order to creat...
Last week saw the publication of an article entitled “The Subterranean War on Science” in the Associ...
Freedom of speech in academia can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it gives the liberty to expr...
I believe that tenured historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science—when presented with the...
The media have become an important arena where struggles over the symbolic legitimacy of expert auth...
Journalism and science are two vocational occupations with roots deep in the momentous developments ...
We discuss the current state of commodification of science and marginalization of individuals and gr...
A new “ethical” elite has arisen in science, the science watchdogs. In response to an inconsistent l...
International audienceAs STS scholars and historians of science have repeatedly shown, scientific kn...
Large-scale online science communication and engagement projects can assume an overly ordered and st...
Science is in crisis: a crisis of trust, and a crisis of values. Yet, this is an opportune moment fo...
Journal peer review performed in the natural sciences has been an object of study since at least 183...
ABSTRACT—Trafimow and Rice (2009; this issue) have written a thought-provoking article that addresse...
This paper explores the phenomena of public scientific debates, where scientific controversies are a...
[Extract] Given the intensity of retributions against environmentalists globally, and the potential ...
Nosek and Bar-Anan suggest that psychologists should embrace digital communication in order to creat...