Litter Survival Differences between Divergently Selected Lines for Environmental Sensitivity in Rabbits

[EN] Simple Summary Two rabbit lines are divergently selected for increasing or decreasing the variability of litter size at birth. Decreasing the litter size variability produces more resilient females with less sensitivity to diseases, being an indirect selection way to improve environmental sensitivity. The kits' survival rate at weaning was higher in the homogeneous line. Moreover, this line led to a greater uniformity of the kits' weight at weaning, although the weight variability at birth was higher, which could be due to a higher lactation capacity of the homogeneous line. A divergent selection experiment on environmental sensitivity was performed in rabbits. The aim was to estimate the correlated response in kit weight and survival, litter weight, and weight distance from birth to weaning. The weight distance was calculated as the absolute value of the differences between the individual value and the mean value of its litter. The relationship between the probability of survival at 4 d of age, and the weight at birth, was studied. Environmental sensitivity was measured as litter size variability. A total of 2484 kits from 127 does from the low line, and 1916 kits of 114 does from the high line of the 12th generation were weighed. Both of the lines showed similar individual and litter weights at birth and weaning, and a similar survival rate at birth, and at 4 d of age. The survival rate at weaning was higher in the low line (0.67 and 0.62; P = 0.93). The weight distance was higher at birth, but lower at weaning in the low line (47.8 g and 54.1 g; P = 0.98). When the weight at birth was high, the kits had a higher survival rate. In conclusion, selection for environmental sensitivity showed a correlated response in the kits' survival, and in the homogeneity of litter weight at weaning.This study is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) with the Projects AGL2017-86083, C2-1-P and C2-2-P.Agea, I.; Garcia, M.; Blasco Mateu, A.; Argente, M. (2019). Litter Survival Differences between Divergently Selected Lines for Environmental Sensitivity in Rabbits. Animals. 9(9):1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani90906031999Garcı́a, M. L., & Baselga, M. (2002). Estimation of genetic response to selection in litter size of rabbits using a cryopreserved control population. Livestock Production Science, 74(1), 45-53. doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(01)00280-9Sánchez, J. P., Theilgaard, P., Mínguez, C., & Baselga, M. (2008). Constitution and evaluation of a long-lived productive rabbit line1. Journal of Animal Science, 86(3), 515-525. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0217Larzul, C., Ducrocq, V., Tudela, F., Juin, H., & Garreau, H. (2014). The length of productive life can be modified through selection: An experimental demonstration in the rabbit1. Journal of Animal Science, 92(6), 2395-2401. doi:10.2527/jas.2013-7216Rauw, W. ., Kanis, E., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E. ., & Grommers, F. . (1998). Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Production Science, 56(1), 15-33. doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(98)00147-xBlasco, A., Martínez-Álvaro, M., García, M.-L., Ibáñez-Escriche, N., & Argente, M.-J. (2017). Selection for environmental variance of litter size in rabbits. Genetics Selection Evolution, 49(1). doi:10.1186/s12711-017-0323-4Argente, M. J., García, M. L., Zbyňovská, K., Petruška, P., Capcarová, M., & Blasco, A. (2019). Correlated response to selection for litter size environmental variability in rabbits’ resilience. animal, 13(10), 2348-2355. doi:10.1017/s1751731119000302Bolet, G., Esparbié, J., & Falières, J. (1996). Relations entre le nombre de fœtus par corne utérine, la taille de portée à la naissance et la croissance pondérale des lapereaux. Annales de Zootechnie, 45(2), 185-200. doi:10.1051/animres:19960207Poigner J., Szendrõ Zs., Lévai A., Radnai I., & Biró-Németh E. (2010). EFFECT OF BIRTH WEIGHT AND LITTER SIZE ON GROWTH AND MORTALITY IN RABBITS. World Rabbit Science, 8(1). doi:10.4995/wrs.2000.413TM Threshold Modelhttp://snp.toulouse.inra.fr/~alegarra/manualtm.pdfPeiró, R., Badawy, A. Y., Blasco, A., & Santacreu, M. A. (2019). Correlated responses on growth traits after two-stage selection for ovulation rate and litter size in rabbits. animal, 13(11), 2457-2462. doi:10.1017/s1751731119001423Pascual, J. J., Savietto, D., Cervera, C., & Baselga, M. (2013). Resources allocation in reproductive rabbit does: a review of feeding and genetic strategies for suitable performance. World Rabbit Science, 21(3). doi:10.4995/wrs.2013.1236Bolet, G., Garreau, H., Joly, T., Theau-Clement, M., Falieres, J., Hurtaud, J., & Bodin, L. (2007). Genetic homogenisation of birth weight in rabbits: Indirect selection response for uterine horn characteristics. Livestock Science, 111(1-2), 28-32. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2006.11.012Garreau, H., Bolet, G., Larzul, C., Robert-Granié, C., Saleil, G., SanCristobal, M., & Bodin, L. (2008). Results of four generations of a canalising selection for rabbit birth weight. Livestock Science, 119(1-3), 55-62. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2008.02.009Hamilton, H. H., Lukefahr, S. D., & McNitt, J. I. (1997). Maternal nest quality and its influence on litter survival and weaning performance in commercial rabbits. Journal of Animal Science, 75(4), 926. doi:10.2527/1997.754926xVicente, J., García-Ximénez, F., & Viudes-de-Castro, M. (1995). Neonatal performances in 3 lines of rabbit (litter sizes, litter and individual weights). Annales de Zootechnie, 44(3), 255-261. doi:10.1051/animres:19950305Hull, D., & Segall, M. M. (1965). The contribution of brown adipose tissue to heat production in the new-born rabbit. The Journal of Physiology, 181(3), 449-457. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007773Spencer, S. A., & Hull, D. (1984). The effect of over-feeding newborn rabbits on somatic and visceral growth, body composition and long-term growth potential. British Journal of Nutrition, 51(3), 389-402. doi:10.1079/bjn19840045Venge, O. (1963). The influence of nursing behaviour and milk production on early growth in rabbits. Animal Behaviour, 11(4), 500-506. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(63)90269-0Coureaud, G., Schaal, B., Coudert, P., Rideaud, P., Fortun-Lamothe, L., Hudson, R., & Orgeur, P. (2000). Immediate postnatal sucking in the rabbit: Its influence on pup survival and growth. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 40(1), 19-32. doi:10.1051/rnd:2000117Argente, M. J., Santacreu, M. A., Climent, A., & Blasco, A. (1999). Phenotypic and genetic parameters of birth weight and weaning weight of rabbits born from unilaterally ovariectomized and intact does. Livestock Production Science, 57(2), 159-167. doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(98)00166-3Xiccato, G., Trocino, A., Sartori, A., & Queaque, P. I. (2004). Effect of parity order and litter weaning age on the performance and body energy balance of rabbit does. Livestock Production Science, 85(2-3), 239-251. doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(03)00125-8Rebollar, P. G., Pérez-Cabal, M. A., Pereda, N., Lorenzo, P. L., Arias-Álvarez, M., & García-Rebollar, P. (2009). Effects of parity order and reproductive management on the efficiency of rabbit productive systems. Livestock Science, 121(2-3), 227-233. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2008.06.01