Under the civil liability legislation enacted in most Australian jurisdictions, factual causation will be established if, on the balance of probabilities, the claimant can prove that the defendant's negligence was 'a necessary condition of the occurrence of the [claimant's] harm'. Causation will then be satisfied by showing that the harm would not have occurred 'but for' the defendant's breach of their duty of care. However, in an exceptional or appropriate case, sub-section 2 of the legislation provides that if the 'but for' test is not met, factual causation may instead be determined in accordance with other 'established principles'. In such a case, 'the court is to consider (amongst other relevant things) whether or not and why responsib...
In the United Kingdom, the most difficult aspect of proving a medical malpractice claim may be estab...
In proving negligence, one of the elements which the plaintiff must prove is that the damage suffere...
The High Court of Australia in Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Limited and...
Several elements must be shown to be fulfilled for a court to hold that negligence has occurred, and...
The decision in the Bailey v. Ministry of Defence case raises some interesting issues in relation to...
In a medical negligence context, and under the causation provisions enacted pursuant to Civil Liabil...
The opportunities and challenges faced by litigants who strategically plead intentional torts are bo...
The opportunities and challenges faced by litigants who strategically plead intentional torts are bo...
Through an examination of Wallace v Kam, this article considers and evaluates the law of causation i...
Through an examination of Wallace v Kam, this article considers and evaluates the law of causation i...
Background Law entails precedent-based common law and parliamentary-legislation-based statutory law....
This editorial on health and guardianship law provides an overview of the causation issues that prec...
Causation is an important concept in negligence law in which plaintiff would have to prove that the ...
Negligence is not a ground of liability unless it causes injury or damage to some interest which the...
The High Court of Australia in Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Limited an...
In the United Kingdom, the most difficult aspect of proving a medical malpractice claim may be estab...
In proving negligence, one of the elements which the plaintiff must prove is that the damage suffere...
The High Court of Australia in Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Limited and...
Several elements must be shown to be fulfilled for a court to hold that negligence has occurred, and...
The decision in the Bailey v. Ministry of Defence case raises some interesting issues in relation to...
In a medical negligence context, and under the causation provisions enacted pursuant to Civil Liabil...
The opportunities and challenges faced by litigants who strategically plead intentional torts are bo...
The opportunities and challenges faced by litigants who strategically plead intentional torts are bo...
Through an examination of Wallace v Kam, this article considers and evaluates the law of causation i...
Through an examination of Wallace v Kam, this article considers and evaluates the law of causation i...
Background Law entails precedent-based common law and parliamentary-legislation-based statutory law....
This editorial on health and guardianship law provides an overview of the causation issues that prec...
Causation is an important concept in negligence law in which plaintiff would have to prove that the ...
Negligence is not a ground of liability unless it causes injury or damage to some interest which the...
The High Court of Australia in Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Limited an...
In the United Kingdom, the most difficult aspect of proving a medical malpractice claim may be estab...
In proving negligence, one of the elements which the plaintiff must prove is that the damage suffere...
The High Court of Australia in Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Limited and...