Add to ORKGRespondent was accused of unfair labor practices. At the hearing before the trial examiner, respondent requested pre-trial statements of the general counsel\u27s witnesses who testified, for the purpose of impeaching their credibility on cross-examination. The trial examiner\u27s refusal was upheld by the NLRB. Upon motion to reopen the record, held, the record is reopened and further proceedings are to be held before the trial examiner. The holding of Jencks v. United States applies to NLRB proceedings; hence respondent has the right for cross-examination purposes to production of pre-trial statements made by the general counsel\u27s witnesses which directly relate to their testimony. Ra-Rich Mfg. Corp., 121 N.L.R.B. No. 90, 42 L.R.R.M. 14...
As the Court has granted cert on two Confrontation Clause cases, I think this case should be held. N...
The United States Supreme Court held that evidence tending to show different treatment of similarly ...
Does the Confrontation Clause permit the prosecution to introduce a forensic laboratory report throu...
Respondent was accused of unfair labor practices. At the hearing before the trial examiner, responde...
At the close of plaintiff\u27s pre-trial examination of. defendant corporation\u27s employee on the ...
In a criminal prosecution under the anti-trust laws, counsel for the United States, in the cross-exa...
Traditionally, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has closely adhered to this strict standard.\u27 I...
Defendant was convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. §1001. During the trial, the court denied defend...
Petitioner-cross-respondent Sears Roebuck & Company seeks review of a National Labor Relations Board...
In Wright Line, the National Labor Relations Board (Board) abandoned its standard causation test for...
Despite similarities in form, a cross-examination in a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) trial ...
Petitioner Walter Kudla and intervenors John Kuebler and Richard Van Romer seek review of an order b...
The National Labor Relations Board found on complaint of a rival union that Bowman Transportation, I...
Plaintiff brought an action against his employer in a federal district court under the Federal Emplo...
Three employees of respondent company, members of a union, were discharged. They had attended an org...
As the Court has granted cert on two Confrontation Clause cases, I think this case should be held. N...
The United States Supreme Court held that evidence tending to show different treatment of similarly ...
Does the Confrontation Clause permit the prosecution to introduce a forensic laboratory report throu...
Respondent was accused of unfair labor practices. At the hearing before the trial examiner, responde...
At the close of plaintiff\u27s pre-trial examination of. defendant corporation\u27s employee on the ...
In a criminal prosecution under the anti-trust laws, counsel for the United States, in the cross-exa...
Traditionally, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has closely adhered to this strict standard.\u27 I...
Defendant was convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. §1001. During the trial, the court denied defend...
Petitioner-cross-respondent Sears Roebuck & Company seeks review of a National Labor Relations Board...
In Wright Line, the National Labor Relations Board (Board) abandoned its standard causation test for...
Despite similarities in form, a cross-examination in a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) trial ...
Petitioner Walter Kudla and intervenors John Kuebler and Richard Van Romer seek review of an order b...
The National Labor Relations Board found on complaint of a rival union that Bowman Transportation, I...
Plaintiff brought an action against his employer in a federal district court under the Federal Emplo...
Three employees of respondent company, members of a union, were discharged. They had attended an org...
As the Court has granted cert on two Confrontation Clause cases, I think this case should be held. N...
The United States Supreme Court held that evidence tending to show different treatment of similarly ...
Does the Confrontation Clause permit the prosecution to introduce a forensic laboratory report throu...