In grading a street for the purpose of paving, it was necessary to remove earth which the city had no occasion for, and the street commissioner sold the same to a party who removed and used it. In an action to recover the purchase-price the purchaser defended, claiming that the city did not own the earth, but that it was owned by the adjoining lot-owners..
The exercise of eminent domain by the State to undertake compulsory acquisition of property for publ...
Plaintiff, operator of a boat company, owned land adjoining a river. X held land between that of the...
Is land use planning fundamentally different from other forms of central planning? If so, does that ...
In grading a street for the purpose of paving, it was necessary to remove earth which the city had n...
1. RIGHT OF OWNERS OF ADJOINING LOTS TO MATERIAL TAKEN FROM STREETS - SALE OF SAME BY CITY. - In gra...
By the plat, the lots of P and D in the unincorporated village of Crescent were separated by a stree...
In this paper, I examine how the rights of owners, lenders and residents threaten the functioning of...
Over the years, regulatory takings case law has supported land use regulations by cloaking them with...
This study uses normative research methods. The concept of appropriate and fair compensation for the...
The authors examine the nature and significance of ownership constraints within the urban redevelopm...
Ownership right on building land is one of the property rights which had been deprived from citizens...
In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the Supreme Court held that, when a regulation has depri...
The implications of ownership When you own the land, things are different. In the “bundle of sticks ...
Boundaries - Property Conveyed - Half of Lot Street - Plaintiff and defendants own, respectively, ...
Defendant municipality made surface and curb improvements on a street located near plaintiff railroa...
The exercise of eminent domain by the State to undertake compulsory acquisition of property for publ...
Plaintiff, operator of a boat company, owned land adjoining a river. X held land between that of the...
Is land use planning fundamentally different from other forms of central planning? If so, does that ...
In grading a street for the purpose of paving, it was necessary to remove earth which the city had n...
1. RIGHT OF OWNERS OF ADJOINING LOTS TO MATERIAL TAKEN FROM STREETS - SALE OF SAME BY CITY. - In gra...
By the plat, the lots of P and D in the unincorporated village of Crescent were separated by a stree...
In this paper, I examine how the rights of owners, lenders and residents threaten the functioning of...
Over the years, regulatory takings case law has supported land use regulations by cloaking them with...
This study uses normative research methods. The concept of appropriate and fair compensation for the...
The authors examine the nature and significance of ownership constraints within the urban redevelopm...
Ownership right on building land is one of the property rights which had been deprived from citizens...
In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the Supreme Court held that, when a regulation has depri...
The implications of ownership When you own the land, things are different. In the “bundle of sticks ...
Boundaries - Property Conveyed - Half of Lot Street - Plaintiff and defendants own, respectively, ...
Defendant municipality made surface and curb improvements on a street located near plaintiff railroa...
The exercise of eminent domain by the State to undertake compulsory acquisition of property for publ...
Plaintiff, operator of a boat company, owned land adjoining a river. X held land between that of the...
Is land use planning fundamentally different from other forms of central planning? If so, does that ...